anonymous
  • anonymous
3D coordinate systems
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Find the volume of the solid that lies inside both of the spheres x^2 + y^2 + z^2 + 4x -2y + 4z + 5 = 0 x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 4 I solved the first equation and got: (x+2)^2 + (y-1)^2 + (z+2)^2 = 4 But idk how to finish it
anonymous
  • anonymous
You're looking for the volume of the intersection (the sort of lemon-shaped region in the graphic).
1 Attachment
anonymous
  • anonymous
Do i have to integrate?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
I would think so. You can find the volume by setting up a triple integral. The trick is finding the proper limits of integration. I'm not sure if there's a non-calculus way to do it.
anonymous
  • anonymous
What if I rotate it across the xy plane? with disks
anonymous
  • anonymous
I'm not entirely sure what you mean, but if I'm following it sounds like you mean trying to rearrange one of the spheres so that one is directly above the other. That would certainly make the integral setup easier. Like this, but in 3 dimensions: |dw:1433108834455:dw| You could then theoretically find the volume using the disk/shell method, sure.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I just remember my book proved the volume of a sphere this way: |dw:1433108968408:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
So something like that
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1433109006413:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
Wouldn't it be that area
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yes, though I think you should arrange the spheres the other way as in my drawing. This way you only have to set up one integral as opposed to two.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.