anonymous
  • anonymous
Given the function f[x] = x/E^(x^2) Then how would you go about Expanding (f[x+h] - f[x])/h And then assuming that h=0 how would simplify that?
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
triciaal
  • triciaal
|dw:1433124964963:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
\[\huge f(x)=\frac{x}{e^{x^2}}\]?
anonymous
  • anonymous
That's part of the answer.. I think I got this far ... (the exponent needs to be made negative) \[f[x] = x e^{-x^{2}}\] but then my calculator says that (f[x+h] - f[x])/h = \[\frac{ -(x e ^{-x^{-2}}) }{ h } + e^{-(h+x)^{2}} + \frac{(x e^{-(h +x)^{2}}}{h}\] but now I don't know how it got there, and then my calculator says it should simplify to this \[(1 - 2x^{2}) e{-x^{2}}\] but again, I have no idea how it got there either. And I need to be able to do this on paper without a calc

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
oh damn.. copied it wrong.. one sec.. that 2nd equation doesnt have a negative 2 in the exponent.. its a positive 2...
triciaal
  • triciaal
@jim_thompson5910
anonymous
  • anonymous
\[- \frac {x e^{-x^{2}}}{h} + e^{-(h+x)^{2}} +\frac {x e^{-(h+x)^{2}}}{h}\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
I think ** that I want to multiply that middle set of terms by h/h ?and then I can drop the denominator
anonymous
  • anonymous
Okay so I got to here.. now I'm trying to expand / FOIL it in the denominator, I think is the next step, \[\left( \frac{ x+h }{e^{(x+h)^{2}}} - \frac{x}{e^{x^{2}}} \right)* \frac{1}{h}\]
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
@hughfuve that's actually where you were supposed to start. do you know where you are trying to get to (because knowing that really helps too)?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yes, the problem First defines \[f[x]= x/E^{x^2} \] Then gives the mathematica function for instantaneous growth via... \[f`[x] = E^{-x^2}-2x^{2} * E^{-x^2​}\] Which I believe is basically the expanded function of (f[x +h] - f[x])/h When h=0 It then uses the mathematica Expand[ (f[x +h] - f[x])/h ] command. and comes up with \[- \frac {x e^{-x^{2}}}{h} + e^{-(h+x)^{2}} +\frac {x e^{-(h+x)^{2}}}{h}\] And then applies the Together[f`[x]] command which creates this... \[-((-1+2x^2) e^{-x^2}) \] Which simplifies to this \[(1-2x^2) e^{-x^2}\] Then it asks me to explain why and how it did that.. In similar problems, I just expanded with h=0 and simplified out the 0's taking what was left, but in this case, if I use h=0 I get stuck trying to work out the algebra for exponents with exponents in a rational expression. And I dont come anywhere close to what mathematica is putting out.
anonymous
  • anonymous
so Im stuck at the starting point..
anonymous
  • anonymous
I really think I'm just missing some fundamental rules of algebra to do with denominators and exponents, but it hasn't clicked yet.
triciaal
  • triciaal
@zepdrix thanks
anonymous
  • anonymous
by the way.. thanks for helping me on this.. my heads blowing a fuse :)
triciaal
  • triciaal
@UsukiDoll please help
anonymous
  • anonymous
Maybe if I can work out how this \[- \frac {x e^{-x^{2}}}{h} + e^{-(h+x)^{2}} +\frac {x e^{-(h+x)^{2}}}{h} \] Simplifies to this. \[\frac {-(x e^{-x^{2}}) +(h + x) e^{-(h+x)^{2}}} {h}\] It might start to make sense
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
if you are around tomorrow, i can help
anonymous
  • anonymous
thnx I'll be around
anonymous
  • anonymous
\[\left( \frac{ x+h }{e^{(x+h)^{2}}} - \frac{x}{e^{x^{2}}} \right)* \frac{1}{h}\] Okay I think this is the first missing link I think.... a / E^n = a E^-n Therefore \[ \left( (x+h)e^{-(x+h)^2}-x e^{-x^{2}} \right) * \frac{1}{h} \] \[ \frac{ (x+h)e^{-(x+h)^2}-x e^{-x^{2}} } {h} \] Now to work out how and why this leads f'[x] to become \[f`[x] = E^{-x^2}-2x^{2} * E^{-x^2​}\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
\[\frac{ (x+h)e^{-(x+h)^2}-x e^{-x^{2}} } {h}\] \[ ( x e^{-(x+h)^2}+h e^{-(x+h)^2}-x e^{-x^{2}} ) h^{-1} \] \[ h^{-1} x e^{-(x+h)^2}+h^{-1} h e^{-(x+h)^2}-h^{-1} x e^{-x^{2}} \] \[ \frac{ x e^{-(x+h)^2}}{h}+ e^{-(x+h)^2}-\frac{ x e^{-x^{2}}}{h} \] Ah! so I see now at least one way how the denominator can cancel out of the middle terms
anonymous
  • anonymous
Ah! I see.. After some sleep and some googling, I discovered f`[x] means the derivative of the function f[x] I have never encountered a derivative before I need to go learn what that is.
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
"f`[x] means the derivative of the function f[x]" yep, that't how you can work out the answer before you do the algebra!
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
\( \frac{d}{dx} (\frac{x}{e^{x^2}}) = \frac{1}{e^{x^2}} (1 - 2x^{2})\) is what you are trying to get to.
anonymous
  • anonymous
hell yeah, that's exactly it!
anonymous
  • anonymous
now to get my head around it
anonymous
  • anonymous
reading up on Leibniz ...
anonymous
  • anonymous
Okay now I understand the problem better.. Can anybody explain the steps to the algebra that arrives at the derivative to f[x] = x/e^(x^2) ?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Okay I will close.. By the way I found a decent online book on this subject for anyone else who needs help with this kind of thing. Keislers Elementary Calculus , An Infinitesimal Approach http://www.math.wisc.edu/~keisler/calc.html Chapters (1 & 2)
anonymous
  • anonymous
going to restate the problem and start again

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.