anonymous
  • anonymous
Differentiate: f(x)=x^5/2e^x i got (1/2)e^x x^3/2 (2x+5) is that right?
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
the exponential is in the denominator with the 5 or no?:) oh oh oh, it's x^(5/2)
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
\[\Large\rm f(x)=x^{5/2}e^x\]This?
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
Hmm yah looks correct, maybe a little over simplified though hehe.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
product rule... if that's really the question?!!?!?!??!
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
this is frustrating... can you draw the question?!
triciaal
  • triciaal
|dw:1433130619166:dw|
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
could be quotient rule... product rule... I have no idea.. I think everyone needs to learn Latex...I can see why people at stackexchange go nuts sometimes.
anonymous
  • anonymous
yeah thats it! sorry!! lol
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
which..?
triciaal
  • triciaal
@freckles more esp needed? another example of the conversation this morning
anonymous
  • anonymous
the drawing is correct
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
what tricaal wrote is the right one.
anonymous
  • anonymous
wait no hold on ill draw it
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
ok... that would be great. we all confused here.
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1433138019813:dw|
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
Yes, the one I posted. So your solution is correct.
anonymous
  • anonymous
oh sorry i just kept scrolling down okay great thanks!!
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
I think he went a bit overboard. |dw:1433127295354:dw| where did you get the 2x+5 in your answer?
anonymous
  • anonymous
im looking at my notes but now i cant figure it out
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
hmmm even wolfram agrees with you.. must be some ... oh of course. your answer is a factored out version of what I have.
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
yeah it's fine... both answers are correct... it's just that one extra step which is factoring like terms came into play here. I though I lost my mind for a sec lol
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
you can factor the smallest x, e^x, and a 1/2 out ... that's what happened...when I distributed those things. I got my answer.
anonymous
  • anonymous
yeah jaja, but on my hw i think i didnt need to factor everything out, so i got confused
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
normally you don't have to... you could if you want. but an unfactored version
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
sorry os messed up an unfacrtored version of an answer is just as good as a factored version

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.