anonymous
  • anonymous
FAN AND MEDAL A man is convicted of a crime but did not have an attorney to represent him at his trial. Under what circumstances would this be unconstitutional according to Gideon v. Wainwright? If the man was unable to afford an attorney and the court refused to provide one If the man chose to not use his right to an attorney and represent himself If the man was insane and no attorney would choose to represent him If the man was unaware that he had the right to be represented by an attorney
History
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
@scburchell11
anonymous
  • anonymous
It could be either A or D. Ill do some research
anonymous
  • anonymous
okay thanks

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
Its A
anonymous
  • anonymous
thanks

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.