At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
@Abhisar @ganeshie8 @pooja195 can you please help?
do you think you can help me @iCake ?
Rise in woman's average wages.
Thats what I thought also, thanks!
can you help with a few more?
maybe what are the questions?
What occurred as a result of the Supreme Court's ruling in Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)? Police powers were enlarged. Executive privilege was limited. Freedom of the press was protected. Rights of the accused were expanded.
I think this one is C...
rights of the accused were expanded that case gave the accused the right to protection if they cant afford
really? I thought that was the Mapp vs Ohio case...
"The Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision written by Justice Hugo Black, ruled that Gideon's conviction was unconstitutional because Gideon was denied a defense lawyer at trial. The Court ruled that the Constitution's Sixth Amendment gives defendants the right to counsel in criminal trials where the defendant is charged with a serious offense even if they cannot afford one themselves; it states that "in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence." - http://www.pbs.org/wnet/supremecourt/rights/landmark_gideon.html
Oh i see, so the answer would be D then, correct?
What did the Supreme Court say in its ruling in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)? Affirmative action programs do not violate the Constitution. Racial quotas are necessary to correct for past discrimination. The Constitution forbids any government policy that uses a racial classification. Even states without official segregation policies must take steps to integrate their schools.
I put A, but I'm not sure about it