How many lines of symmetry does this figure have?

- anonymous

How many lines of symmetry does this figure have?

- jamiebookeater

See more answers at brainly.com

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions

- Jamierox4ev3r

attachment?

- xapproachesinfinity

i can't see any attachment either?

- anonymous

##### 1 Attachment

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

## More answers

- xapproachesinfinity

oh man i hate when user attach docs
just snapshot the thing and post it

- anonymous

it would be the 2nd answer

- xapproachesinfinity

do not just give answers

- Jamierox4ev3r

Don't provide direct answers @SkaterBoyShawn
Basically, this question is asking you how many times you can fold the figure perfectly in halves.

- anonymous

i though tit was 4 lines of syemtry

- xapproachesinfinity

first let's understand what does line of symmetry to an object?

- anonymous

ok

- Jamierox4ev3r

|dw:1433289397901:dw|

- xapproachesinfinity

hmm actually 4 seems good to me

- anonymous

right

- Jamierox4ev3r

so you could split the object up and down

- anonymous

yes

- Jamierox4ev3r

|dw:1433289474760:dw|
those are your two first lines of symmetry

- xapproachesinfinity

so basicallly line of symmetry cuts the object into identical mirror images

- Jamierox4ev3r

|dw:1433289507874:dw|
and you can do it twice diagonally

- Jamierox4ev3r

and what @xapproachesinfinity said is correct. If you can reflect the images perfectly along the line of symmetry, then the line of symmetry is valid

- Jamierox4ev3r

so 4 seems like a reasonable answer

- xapproachesinfinity

well i guess @Jamierox4ev3r is doing great explaining this
i let him/her explain it :)

- anonymous

so 4 is the naswer

- Jamierox4ev3r

4 lines of symmetry, yes

- xapproachesinfinity

@princess1990 challenge
how many this figure has
|dw:1433289667240:dw|

- anonymous

no answer never mind

- Jamierox4ev3r

Hint: All sides are equal

- xapproachesinfinity

again just imagine that shape as piece of paper and you can tie it play with it

- anonymous

2

- xapproachesinfinity

hmm close
you missed one

- anonymous

3

- xapproachesinfinity

since all sides are equal you can have 3 line of symmetry

- xapproachesinfinity

yes! it is 3

- anonymous

A quadrilateral has angles that measure 125°, 115°, and 65°.
What is the measure of the fourth angle?

- Jamierox4ev3r

|dw:1433290036342:dw|

- xapproachesinfinity

interior angles in quad sum up to 360

- xapproachesinfinity

see what is needed to complete 360

- anonymous

so the answer is 360

- anonymous

i say 2 if thats ok

- xapproachesinfinity

no i said all angles add up to 360
can't have one that is 360

- anonymous

- xapproachesinfinity

sum up those angles that they give you and see what you need to reach 360

- anonymous

305

- xapproachesinfinity

how much you need to reach 360

- anonymous

55

- xapproachesinfinity

yes

- anonymous

What is the measure of ∠B?

- xapproachesinfinity

what is that new question?

- anonymous

What is the measure of ∠B?

- anonymous

##### 1 Attachment

- xapproachesinfinity

post new questions in different posts! so others have a chance to answer you and assist you

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.