A video game company surveys a random sample of 250 gamers who report annual income of $50,000. The company finds that the average gamer spends $206 a year on games, with a standard deviation of $12.
Another company is also interested in the amount game consumers spend, and surveys a random sample of 225 gamers with a verified yearly income of $50,000. The company finds that the average gamer spends $250 a year on games, with a standard deviation of $15.
Why is the second survey more believable than the first?
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
A. size of the confidence interval for the second survey
B. lack of randomization in the first survey
C. likelihood of those in the first survey to lie about the amount they make
D.size of the sample for the second survey