A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
anonymous
 one year ago
optimization problem. Maximum volume of a box?
I don't know how to set this up. We're using a paper with dimensions 8(1/2) inches by 11 inches to form a box WITH a lid with maximum volume. Obviously I'm using the formula v=length x width x height but I don't know how to get v(x) :/
anonymous
 one year ago
optimization problem. Maximum volume of a box? I don't know how to set this up. We're using a paper with dimensions 8(1/2) inches by 11 inches to form a box WITH a lid with maximum volume. Obviously I'm using the formula v=length x width x height but I don't know how to get v(x) :/

This Question is Closed

dan815
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0also ask yourself are you able to cut the paper in any way u want or do u have to fold it

dan815
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0is it possible to just wrap this paper around some cube?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0ok so I'm able to cut identical squares out of the corners and in the middle so I cold then fold it up into the box.

ybarrap
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0You might want to try using the method of Lagrange: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange_multiplier $$ \text{Maximize: }l\times w\times h\\ \text{Subject to the constraint: }2\times(hw+lh+wh)=8.5\times 11\\ \text{Hence,}\\ \Lambda(x,y,z,\lambda)=lwh+\lambda\left (hw+lh+wl\cfrac{8.5\times 11}{2}\right ) $$ Now find the partials: $$ \Lambda_h=wl+\lambda(w+l)=0\\ \Lambda_w=hl+\lambda(h+l)=0\\ \Lambda_l=hw+\lambda(h+w)=0\\ \Lambda_{\lambda}=hw+lh+wl\cfrac{8.5\times 11}{2}=0\\ $$ Using first equation, we find for \(\lambda\) $$ \lambda=\cfrac{wl}{w+l} $$ Plugging this into the second and third equation we get that \(w=l\) Using this result, we get that \(\lambda =\cfrac{w}{2}\) Using these results into the last two equations we find the final value for \(h\). I'll let you do that. Once you have this result, plug back into your constraint to find the actual values. Does this make sense?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I had to reread it a few times but I think I got it. Thank you :)
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.