friendzone
  • friendzone
On a number line, which number would not be included as a solution to this inequality? Justify. -2.4 < n - 0.6 A) -1.8; -1.8 is not greater than itself B) -1; -1 is not greater than itself C) 0; 0 is not greater than 2 D) 2; 2 is not less than 0
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
welshfella
  • welshfella
-2.4 < n - 0.6 add 0.6 to both sides -2.4 + 0.6 < n -1.8 < n write it from left to right:- n > -1.8
welshfella
  • welshfella
this mean ' n is greater that -1.8' so which option do you think is not included in the inequality? for example 0 will be included because 0 is greater that 1.8
friendzone
  • friendzone
this is so confusing im sorry lol

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

welshfella
  • welshfella
- if we put n = 0 in the inequality 0 > -1.8 which is true so C is not the answer
friendzone
  • friendzone
but its A
welshfella
  • welshfella
yes you are right because -1.8 .> -1.8 is not true (-1.8 = -1.8 )
welshfella
  • welshfella
understand?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.