A prominent rhetorical feature of this paragraph is...
A. rhetorical questions.
B. logical fallacies.
D. factual details.
E. appeals to authority.
**I'm thinking it's hyperbole or factual details, but not very sure! Thanks!
Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
Lough Ness, though not twelve miles broad, is a very remarkable diffusion of water without islands. It fills a large hollow between two ridges of high rocks, being supplied partly by the torrents which fall into it on either side, and partly, as is supposed, by springs at the bottom. Its water is remarkably clear and pleasant, and is imagined by the natives to be medicinal. We were told, that it is in some places a hundred and forty fathoms deep, a profundity scarcely credible, and which probably those that relate it have never sounded. Its fish are salmon, trout, and pike.
Well, we can eliminate rhetorical questions because there are no questions in the paragraph.
Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.
how about the others?
I don't think it's hyperbole b/c it's meant more to persuade and be taken literally than not to be taken literally.
It's not factual details because there aren't really facts that are proven.
The last one doesn't make sense at all with the paragraph.
ohh okay! so it should be logical fallacies?
I believe so, yes.
Because logical fallacies are misleading arguments, which is what some of the wording in this paragraph use.
Does that make sense?