A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
anonymous
 one year ago
An equilateral triangle 35.0 m on a side has a m1 = 5.00kg mass at one corner, a m2 = 70.00kg mass at another corner, and a m3 = 125.00 kg mass at the third corner. Find the magnitude and direction of the net force acting on the 5.00kg mass.
anonymous
 one year ago
An equilateral triangle 35.0 m on a side has a m1 = 5.00kg mass at one corner, a m2 = 70.00kg mass at another corner, and a m3 = 125.00 kg mass at the third corner. Find the magnitude and direction of the net force acting on the 5.00kg mass.

This Question is Open

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Here is what I did: F=Gm1m2/r^2 F(1,2)=((6.67e11)*5*70)/35^2 = 1.9e11N Fy(1,2) = F(1,2)sin(60) = 1.9e11*sin(60)=1.65e11N Fx(1,2) = F(1,2)cos(60) =1.9e11*cos60) = 9.53e12 N Found F the same way at F(1,2) t0 get 3.4e11N for F(1,3) Fy(1,3) = F(1,3)sin(120) =3.4e11N*0.87 = 2.94e11 N Fx(1,3) = F(1,3)cos(120) = 3.4e11N*(0.5) = 1.7e11 N So, the net force on the yaxis is Fy = Fy(1,2)+Fy(1,3) = 4.6e11 N and on the xaxis Fx = Fx(1,2)+Fx(1,3) = 7.47e12 N Then to get FtotalI do sqrt(Fy/fx) For the angle I would do arctan(Fy/Fx) to get 80.77 degrees but its not correct. Please help me with this extremely long problem. I dont know where I messed up.

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0dw:1433713175772:dw You are in the good direction solving this, just make some considerations... if you set the masses as in the picture, the calculation for F(1,2) is exactly as you made it. for F(1,3) the angle would be 0º, not 120º, so you can fix your calculation for that case. finally to get the total magnitude of the force you should use: \[F=\sqrt{F_x^2+F_y^2}\] and for the angle: \[\theta = Arctan(\frac{F_y}{F_x})\]

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So that would make Fx(1.3)=3.4e11 N and Fy(1.3)=0N I did arctan (1.65e11/((3.4e11 + 9.53e12))) to get 20.8 degrees but its not correct. Am I missing something?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0everything you did looks ok to me, let me check the numbers!

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i get 20.66º, its very close to your answer... do you have an answer for this? or you just get right/wrong when you submit?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0also, do you have a picture for the problem, because if we put the 5Kg mass in other vertice the direction may be different, of course the magnitude of F would be the same.

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0No it does not give the correct answers. But here is the picture

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0oh! so m1=5Kg is in the upper vertex, we need to recalculate! For F(1,2) the angle should be 60º, it will have a negative ycomponent, since it points to m2, down and to the right For F(1,3) the angle is 120º, and will have both negative components, since it points to m3 down and to the left dw:1433720613749:dw it should work now...

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I get the same answers as before except the Fx and Fy totals are different signs which doesnt change the magnitude of force. Thank you for all your time btw

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0do you get a different value for the angle now? glad to be able to help you :D

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I got 80.77 which is an answer I already got earlier and it wasnt correct :/ this problem might just be a lost cause for me lol

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0here are my results for the total force: \[F_x=1.29\times 10^{11}N\] \[F_y=1.12\times 10^{11}N\] this makes sense since m3 is the bigger one, and it is placed in the lower left vertex, so the net force points approx to it. for the angle i get 40.97º using: \[\theta = Arctan{(\frac{F_y}{F_x})}=40.97º\] now, we must be careful here, since inverse trigonometric functions often yield results in the 1st or 2nd quadrant, but if we take a look at the resulting vector for the force we can see that the angle should be one of the 3rd quadrant, so i guess what we get here is the angle measured from the negative x direction, so if we want to give the result measured from the positive x direction, as is usually done, we need to either add 180º, obtaining a positive angle, in the 3rd quadrant or give the equivalent negative value. i like the first option here, so the answer would be: \[\theta = 180º + 40.97º = 220.97º\approx 221º\] or \[\theta = 180º + 40.97º = 139.03º\approx 140º\] well, that is what i get, hope that even if it is not the correct answer at least you get an understanding of the problem and the thinking involved. You made an excellent job from the begining! :D
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.