A community for students.

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

saucvi

  • one year ago

Fiber-optic cables are used widely by broadcast and cable companies. When light passes through a fiber-optic cable, its intensity decreases with the increase in the length of the cable. If 1000 lumens of light enters the cable, the intensity of light decreases by 1.2% per meter of the cable. Part A: Can this situation be represented by an exponential function? Justify your answer. (2 points) Part B: Write a function f(x) to represent the intensity of light, in lumens, when it has passed through x meters of the cable. (4 points)

  • This Question is Closed
  1. saucvi
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Part C: Some scientists are trying to make a cable for which the intensity of light would decrease by 8 lumens per unit length of the cable. Can this situation be represented by an exponential function? Justify your answer and write the appropriate function to represent this situation if 1000 lumens of light enter the cable. (4 points)

  2. saucvi
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I only need help with Part C

  3. whpalmer4
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    So that means you need to construct an exponential function which makes a straight line graph, doesn't it?

  4. whpalmer4
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    1000,1000-8=992, 992-8=984, 984-8=976, etc. That looks like \(y = -8x+1000\) to me. Is it possible to make an exponential that does that?

  5. saucvi
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I want to say no but the x variable throws me off..

  6. whpalmer4
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    your instinct is correct. Only way you get a straight line out of an exponential is if you take a logarithm.

  7. whpalmer4
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    in my equation, \(x\) was the distance along the fiber from the starting point, and \(y\) was the intensity.

  8. saucvi
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    So it can be exponential?

  9. whpalmer4
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    no, it cannot. An exponential is not a straight line, because a straight line would be either of the form \[y=k\]horizontal line\[x=k\]vertical line\[y=mx+b\]something in between, with slope \(m\) and \(y\)-intercept \(b\) and an exponential will be of the form \[y = kb^x\]

  10. whpalmer4
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    where \(k\) is a constant, and \(b\) is a constant representing the multiplicative factor. for example, the equation showing the intensity if it drops 1.2% with each meter of fiber: \[y = 1000(1-0.012)^x = 1000(0.988)^x\]

  11. saucvi
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Oh okay. Thank you so much.

  12. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.