ganeshie8
  • ganeshie8
How is this possible \[\frac{1}{4}-\frac{3}{8} = \frac{1}{2}\]
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
It's not :o
CLOBBER02
  • CLOBBER02
help me
ganeshie8
  • ganeshie8
just found an awesome reasoning for how that is possible from one of our users xD
1 Attachment

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
Haha, that's great :))
random231
  • random231
rofl xD
random231
  • random231
wow youre a patient helper ganeshie ;)
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
\[\frac14-\frac38\\ =^? \frac{1-3}{4-8}\\ = \frac24\\ =\frac12\\ \]
ganeshie8
  • ganeshie8
Haha was just thrilled by how that user came up with such cute reasoning!
Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
These kids on here are really smart, they just need the right push :P
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
|dw:1433833984854:dw|
Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
Sorcery!
ganeshie8
  • ganeshie8
thats my fav one! wrong reasoning, right answer they are called happy fractions or something...
Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yajonhixy4g
Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
And http://mathoverflow.net/questions/94742/examples-of-interesting-false-proofs
ganeshie8
  • ganeshie8
interesting, im still a bit clueless about identifying the flaw in that proof(youtube link) showing all triangles are equilateral ...
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
Haha, nice solution. How do you solve this though?
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
I got -1/8 on this T_T!
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
Wolfram says the answer is \(-1/8\). How did it get to that figure?
geekfromthefutur
  • geekfromthefutur
Without wolfram math i wouldn't be smart about math lol
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
lcd yo!
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
What...?
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
\[\frac{2}{2} \times \frac{1}{4} - \frac{3}{8} \rightarrow \frac{2}{8} - \frac{3}{8} \rightarrow = -\frac{1}{8}\]
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
find the least common denominator on this... the sign was missing when I saw that reasoning
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
Oh wow! Interesting method. Nice.
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
actually that's common x.x anyone out there can use least common denominator
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
No I can't.
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
and by the way a - sign was dropped in that image....when clobber did the arithmetic 2-3 = -1 for the numerator
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
but he drew a 1 instead of a -1
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
I just believed that these problems were supposed to be solved by Wolfram because they're hard, so I always plugged these numbers into Wolfram. Didn't know people could actually solve these.
geekfromthefutur
  • geekfromthefutur
Well you can it just takes a while longer to solve the problem but all that matters that getting it solved. Because not every problem is going to be easy as 2 + 2
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
what the...*bangs head*
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
Anyway, thank you for sharing this method! More people should know about it. I'm about to finish high-school and my classmates also use Wolfram for solving fractions.
ganeshie8
  • ganeshie8
lol honestly i never found a satisfying explanation for why common denominator is needed when adding/subing fractions
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
O__________________________O! Okay, that's fine for checking answers, but students shouldn't be dependent on it. My university doesn't allow calculators or computers. Have fun with that
Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
I don't think any mathematics department does ;)
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
wolfram shouldn't be abused... and sometimes even Mr.Wolfy himself makes mistakes
geekfromthefutur
  • geekfromthefutur
Yea it cant solve every problem.
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
there was a professor who allowed everything ... book, calculator...tablet...but he retired recently
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
Haha, ganeshie, it should make sense though. You can add 1/8th and 4/8th of a cake like that, but you can't add 1/8th and half of a cake.
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
I will have to revise my fractions after finishing calculus.
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
oh lol @UnkleRhaukus you just broke a math rule with your example.
Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
Oh I thought you were joking the whole time parth
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
;)
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
all triangles are equilateral
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
You hoped I was joking the whole time. :P
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
I guess I stretched it way too far.
ganeshie8
  • ganeshie8
nope it is fine, the joke is obvious to everyone ;p
Miracrown
  • Miracrown
I knew it
Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
http://puu.sh/i9pL3/b1f88e3e47.png
Miracrown
  • Miracrown
LOL
ganeshie8
  • ganeshie8
should msg it to one of his gfs lol
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
omg dan.
Miracrown
  • Miracrown
ikr @ganeshie8 ;)
Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
Anyways check out those false proofs from that link, pretty cool :)
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
From comments: The mistake lies in the drawing. The lines are too sloppy and if you actually draw it out, you will see C* always lies on the other side of C (or B* on the other side of B), so subtracting C*C from AC does not make the conclusion valid anymore.
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
``` one of his gfs lol ``` Subtle, I like it.
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
last semester I accidentally typed "Dan I love you" instead of "Dan I need your help" because I was working on a matlab code. T_T! I had to type to two people on os that it wasn't spam and it was an accident.
Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
http://puu.sh/i9ruW/6515fd86d6.png
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
Don't worry, Dan's a player. He just gets everyone to fall in love with him.
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
This was before I had glasses, so yeah...I couldn't see well with small text
geekfromthefutur
  • geekfromthefutur
Lol. and i wonder who else hes with xD
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
@Astrophysics Holy crap, hahaha.
Miracrown
  • Miracrown
I like it how this post has completely gone off topic
Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
Sorry haha
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
To be fair, the topic isn't something eye-catching.
Miracrown
  • Miracrown
All good @Astrophysics :)
Miracrown
  • Miracrown
@ganeshie8 can you please give us another prob?
Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
What is \[\huge 2^{2014}-2^{2013}?\]
geekfromthefutur
  • geekfromthefutur
ok
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
\[2^{2013}\]
geekfromthefutur
  • geekfromthefutur
crap it repeated my statment
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
Sorry, wrong answer. Should be\[\huge 2^{2013}\]
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
Or maybe you could do it "that" way:\[\large 2^{2014} - 2^{2013} = 2^{2014 - 2013} = 2^1 = 2\]
Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
Yeah haha, \[\huge 2^{2013}(2) - 2^{2013} \implies 2^{2013}(2-1) = 2^{2013}\]
Miracrown
  • Miracrown
Next one
Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
Geniuses...ok what number am I thinking of?
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
Your SmartScore.
Miracrown
  • Miracrown
96
Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
http://puu.sh/ajiP2/15be9508bf.png
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
You're just cashing in on hartnn's efforts.
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
In hartnn's pic, his arms are all bulgy and muscular. Coincidence? I think not.
zzr0ck3r
  • zzr0ck3r
You should read the classic MathEd paper about Benny.
geerky42
  • geerky42
\(\color{blue}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) ganeshie8 How is this possible \[\frac{1}{4}-\frac{3}{8} = \frac{1}{2}\] \(\color{blue}{\text{End of Quote}}\) It's isn't? What's so amazing about it anyway? All I see is user just happen to think that subtraction works like multiplication, hence did\(\frac{1}{4}-\frac{3}{8} = \frac{1-3}{4-8}\)
UsukiDoll
  • UsukiDoll
^ which broke a math rule...

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.