A community for students.

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

carlj0nes

  • one year ago

d^2x/dt^2 -10 dx/dt +34y =0 Im having difficulty with a question and wondered if you could point me in the right direction. I have a damped oscillation with no external forces. Initial amplitude of the oscillation is 2mm when t =0 and initial velocity is 0mm/s I need to determine the particular solution. d^2x/dt^2 -10 dx/dt +34y =0 Aux Eq m^2 -10m+34=0 m1=5+j6 m2=5-j6 I believe the roots are complex y=e^5x (A cos6x + Bsin6x) and this is where im not sure what to do next. If you could guide me through the next process I would be very grateful. Kind Regards, Carl

  • This Question is Open
  1. carlj0nes
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    I have attached the equation for better clarity.

  2. zepdrix
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Hmm why did you pencil in a y on the 34? Is that a typo? This is x as a function of t, yes? So shouldn't that be 34x? :o

  3. zepdrix
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    And I think maybe there was a boo boo when looking for roots to your auxiliary equation,\[\Large\rm m^2 -10m+34=0\]Leads to,\[\Large\rm m=\frac{10\pm\sqrt{100-4(34)}}{2}\]Looks like you forgot to divide the 6j by the 2, yes?

  4. carlj0nes
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    Yes it is a typo. so was the un damped but I have crossed that out. I have forgotten to do that you are correct.

  5. alekos
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    from what i can remember the final equation should look like x=e^5t(Asin3t + Bcos3t) more or less as you've written So you just need to substitute this into the original diff eq and solve for A and B

  6. alekos
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I meant the final solution. It's tedious I know but that should be the way to do it

  7. alekos
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    @zepdrix can you confirm

  8. Loser66
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    To me, the "initial amplitude...." is when t =0 , y =2, then you just plug t =0 in y =... to find A and " the "initial velocity ..." that is y' =0, hence take derivative of y and plug A = above and t =0 in to get B

  9. alekos
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yes, that sounds good. So you mean plug x=2 when t=0 for the solution above. and dx/dt=0 for t=0 in order to work out the constants. Thats a more efficient way to do it

  10. Loser66
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    oh, he confused me. hehehe

  11. Loser66
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    The original problem is dx/ dt, hence the answer should be x w.r.t. t, not y w.r.t. t. And I am wrong above :)

  12. alekos
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yes. he confused me at first too

  13. Loser66
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    but just replace y by x

  14. alekos
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yes. your method is quite straightforward

  15. carlj0nes
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    Im still confused. I have attached a pic of what I believe is correct.

  16. carlj0nes
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

  17. carlj0nes
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    Text Book example

  18. carlj0nes
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    Hi @zepdrix @alekos @Loser66 would you be able to check what I have done so far and also does B=-3.3 if so is the particular soln y=e^5x (2cos(2x)-3.3sin(2x))

  19. zepdrix
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    -10/3 for the B value? Oo that's what I'm getting also! Why did the coefficient on your angle change to 2's from 3's?

  20. zepdrix
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    From 3x to 2x I mean*

  21. carlj0nes
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    trying to look at notes a book and question at the same time. It should be 3x

  22. IrishBoy123
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    2 and -10/3 also confirmed by a Laplace Transform solution

    1 Attachment
  23. carlj0nes
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    @zepdrix and @ IrishBoy123 regarding this question you helped me on. I now need to Explain clearly with how you could use the differential equation to model an undamped oscillator. Then by extending the differential equation into a forced damped oscillator, explain how you could model such an oscillator using a forced second order differential equation. Would you be able to help please.

  24. carlj0nes
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    @IrishBoy123

  25. IrishBoy123
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    the basic equation for a free undamped oscillator is \(m \ddot x + k x = 0\), ie in this case basic shm for spring k and mass m. for damping you add in a damping term \(c \dot x\) so that \(m \ddot x + c \dot x + k x = 0\) and for forced damped \(m \ddot x + x \dot x + k x = f(t)\) so the eqn is no longer homogeneous this site has pretty pictures and is probably a good start; http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/oscda.html as you have already done the math it should be straightforward.

  26. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.