d^2x/dt^2 -10 dx/dt +34y =0 Im having difficulty with a question and wondered if you could point me in the right direction. I have a damped oscillation with no external forces. Initial amplitude of the oscillation is 2mm when t =0 and initial velocity is 0mm/s I need to determine the particular solution. d^2x/dt^2 -10 dx/dt +34y =0 Aux Eq m^2 -10m+34=0 m1=5+j6 m2=5-j6 I believe the roots are complex y=e^5x (A cos6x + Bsin6x) and this is where im not sure what to do next. If you could guide me through the next process I would be very grateful. Kind Regards, Carl

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions.

A community for students.

d^2x/dt^2 -10 dx/dt +34y =0 Im having difficulty with a question and wondered if you could point me in the right direction. I have a damped oscillation with no external forces. Initial amplitude of the oscillation is 2mm when t =0 and initial velocity is 0mm/s I need to determine the particular solution. d^2x/dt^2 -10 dx/dt +34y =0 Aux Eq m^2 -10m+34=0 m1=5+j6 m2=5-j6 I believe the roots are complex y=e^5x (A cos6x + Bsin6x) and this is where im not sure what to do next. If you could guide me through the next process I would be very grateful. Kind Regards, Carl

Differential Equations
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

I have attached the equation for better clarity.
Hmm why did you pencil in a y on the 34? Is that a typo? This is x as a function of t, yes? So shouldn't that be 34x? :o
And I think maybe there was a boo boo when looking for roots to your auxiliary equation,\[\Large\rm m^2 -10m+34=0\]Leads to,\[\Large\rm m=\frac{10\pm\sqrt{100-4(34)}}{2}\]Looks like you forgot to divide the 6j by the 2, yes?

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

Yes it is a typo. so was the un damped but I have crossed that out. I have forgotten to do that you are correct.
from what i can remember the final equation should look like x=e^5t(Asin3t + Bcos3t) more or less as you've written So you just need to substitute this into the original diff eq and solve for A and B
I meant the final solution. It's tedious I know but that should be the way to do it
@zepdrix can you confirm
To me, the "initial amplitude...." is when t =0 , y =2, then you just plug t =0 in y =... to find A and " the "initial velocity ..." that is y' =0, hence take derivative of y and plug A = above and t =0 in to get B
yes, that sounds good. So you mean plug x=2 when t=0 for the solution above. and dx/dt=0 for t=0 in order to work out the constants. Thats a more efficient way to do it
oh, he confused me. hehehe
The original problem is dx/ dt, hence the answer should be x w.r.t. t, not y w.r.t. t. And I am wrong above :)
yes. he confused me at first too
but just replace y by x
yes. your method is quite straightforward
Im still confused. I have attached a pic of what I believe is correct.
Text Book example
Hi @zepdrix @alekos @Loser66 would you be able to check what I have done so far and also does B=-3.3 if so is the particular soln y=e^5x (2cos(2x)-3.3sin(2x))
-10/3 for the B value? Oo that's what I'm getting also! Why did the coefficient on your angle change to 2's from 3's?
From 3x to 2x I mean*
trying to look at notes a book and question at the same time. It should be 3x
2 and -10/3 also confirmed by a Laplace Transform solution
1 Attachment
@zepdrix and @ IrishBoy123 regarding this question you helped me on. I now need to Explain clearly with how you could use the differential equation to model an undamped oscillator. Then by extending the differential equation into a forced damped oscillator, explain how you could model such an oscillator using a forced second order differential equation. Would you be able to help please.
the basic equation for a free undamped oscillator is \(m \ddot x + k x = 0\), ie in this case basic shm for spring k and mass m. for damping you add in a damping term \(c \dot x\) so that \(m \ddot x + c \dot x + k x = 0\) and for forced damped \(m \ddot x + x \dot x + k x = f(t)\) so the eqn is no longer homogeneous this site has pretty pictures and is probably a good start; http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/oscda.html as you have already done the math it should be straightforward.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question