kanwal32
  • kanwal32
Equivalent capacitance dielectric (if possible tell me what am i doing wrong
Physics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
kanwal32
  • kanwal32
|dw:1434454283651:dw|
kanwal32
  • kanwal32
|dw:1434454418404:dw|
kanwal32
  • kanwal32
lower portion of the capacitance are in parralel so Ceq=\[\frac{ 2EoA/2 }{ d/2 }+\frac{ 4EoA/2 }{ d/2 }\]

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

kanwal32
  • kanwal32
EoA/d=C
kanwal32
  • kanwal32
2C+4C=Ceq
kanwal32
  • kanwal32
6c=Ceq
kanwal32
  • kanwal32
now the lower and upper one are in series
kanwal32
  • kanwal32
\[\frac{ d/2 }{ 6kEoA }+\frac{ 1 }{ 6C }\]
kanwal32
  • kanwal32
\[\frac{ 3 }{ 12C }\]=1/Ceq
kanwal32
  • kanwal32
Ceq=4C but my book says 3.9
kanwal32
  • kanwal32
3.9C
kanwal32
  • kanwal32
@IrishBoy123 @radar @Michele_Laino
kanwal32
  • kanwal32
@IrishBoy123 hlp
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
using the law: \[\Phi \left( {\mathbf{D}} \right) = 4\pi \rho \] where \[\rho \] is the density of free charges, we can write the electric field, inside each region, as follows: \[\begin{gathered} {E_1} = \frac{{4\pi {\sigma _0}}}{{{\varepsilon _1}}}, \hfill \\ \hfill \\ {E_2} = \frac{{4\pi {\sigma _0}}}{{{\varepsilon _2}}}, \hfill \\ \hfill \\ {E_3} = \frac{{4\pi {\sigma _0}}}{{{\varepsilon _3}}}. \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \] where \[{{\sigma _0}}\] is the charge density, in absence of dielectrics |dw:1434516781566:dw|
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
now we can write: \[\begin{gathered} \Delta \varphi = \left( {{E_1} + {E_2}} \right)\frac{d}{2} = \frac{{4\pi {\sigma _0}d}}{2}\left( {\frac{1}{{{\varepsilon _1}}} + \frac{1}{{{\varepsilon _2}}}} \right) = \frac{{{q_0}}}{C} \hfill \\ \hfill \\ C = \frac{{2S}}{{4\pi d}}\frac{{{\varepsilon _1}{\varepsilon _2}}}{{{\varepsilon _1} + {\varepsilon _2}}} = 2{C_0}\frac{{{\varepsilon _1}{\varepsilon _2}}}{{{\varepsilon _1} + {\varepsilon _2}}} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \] where C_0 is the capacitance in absence of dielectrics. Please note that I have used the CGS system
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
similarly we can write: \[C = \frac{{2S}}{{4\pi d}}\frac{{{\varepsilon _1}{\varepsilon _3}}}{{{\varepsilon _1} + {\varepsilon _3}}} = 2{C_0}\frac{{{\varepsilon _1}{\varepsilon _3}}}{{{\varepsilon _1} + {\varepsilon _3}}}\]
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
now if we sum both last equations side by side, we get: \[C = {C_0}\left( {\frac{{{\varepsilon _1}{\varepsilon _2}}}{{{\varepsilon _1} + {\varepsilon _2}}} + \frac{{{\varepsilon _1}{\varepsilon _3}}}{{{\varepsilon _1} + {\varepsilon _3}}}} \right)\] finally substituting your values, we get: \[\begin{gathered} C = {C_0}\left( {\frac{{{\varepsilon _1}{\varepsilon _2}}}{{{\varepsilon _1} + {\varepsilon _2}}} + \frac{{{\varepsilon _1}{\varepsilon _3}}}{{{\varepsilon _1} + {\varepsilon _3}}}} \right) = {C_0}\left( {\frac{{6 \times 2}}{{6 + 2}} + \frac{{6 \times 4}}{{6 + 4}}} \right) = \hfill \\ \hfill \\ = {C_0}\left( {\frac{{12}}{5} + \frac{3}{2}} \right) = 3.9{C_0} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \]

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.