anonymous
  • anonymous
Can you explain Inverse Axiom (Both addition and multiplication)? Can anyone explain this in a "PROOFING" manner? ... (see below)
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Is this true? Explain why. \[4(\frac{ 1 }{ 4 }) = 1\]
geerky42
  • geerky42
Do you know what multiplication inverse is?
anonymous
  • anonymous
reciprocal

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
A number multiplied by its reciprocal is always equal to 1.
anonymous
  • anonymous
"A number which is, 4, multiplied by its reciprocal, 1/4, is equal to 1." Is that how your write in proofing?
freckles
  • freckles
\[a \cdot a^{-1}=1 \text{ for all } a \neq 0\] This is just the multiplicative inverse property
ikram002p
  • ikram002p
Ok so what axiom system your working on ??
anonymous
  • anonymous
I'm working on all types of axiom. From the 5 basics of axiom of equality to the other axioms. I'm just wondering on how could explain it. I saw this material in the internet: http://www.mathhands.com/046/hw/046c01s06ns.pdf Under the "Some questions to think about". Do you have any idea how to explain it in a way the author wants it to be?
anonymous
  • anonymous
In addition to that question, I can't seem to find any other explanation or differences between the 5 basic axioms of Algebra ( Reflexive, Symmetric, Transitive, Additive, and Multiplicative.
freckles
  • freckles
so I guess you are looking for something more then "example: 1/3 is the multiplicative inverse of 3 so 1/3*3=1 or 3*1/3=1" ?
anonymous
  • anonymous
So if the Prof asked me, "True, False, WDKY (we don’t know yet)) \[3(\frac{ 1 }{ 3 }) =3\] Do you know why? exp lain." How will I form my answer?
anonymous
  • anonymous
@freckles
freckles
  • freckles
that would be false because 3*1/3=1
freckles
  • freckles
we already mentioned the multiplicative inverse property above \[a \neq 0\] \[a (\frac{1}{a})=1 \text{ since } a \text{ and } \frac{1}{a} \text{ are multplicative inverses of each other }\]
freckles
  • freckles
I don't know what other answer you are looking for honestly
anonymous
  • anonymous
Maybe, I was expecting a complicated explanation. T.T If it's that simple, then okay. Thank you very much.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.