Liv1234
  • Liv1234
@ganeshie8 Could you take a look at this question please?(:
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
Liv1234
  • Liv1234
Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
Which one can we eliminate right away? :)
Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
|dw:1434473882803:dw| lets put the dimensions

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
|dw:1434473901956:dw| do the dimensions seem right to you?
Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
So it's obvious there has been a reduction right, that should be 3, not 4|dw:1434474035700:dw|
Liv1234
  • Liv1234
So, we can get rid of option D.
Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
Yes, good :), now our new triangle dimensions are halved, do you see that?
Liv1234
  • Liv1234
Yes. So, would our answer be reduction; 1/2?
Liv1234
  • Liv1234
Or no?
Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
Yes, that's good! :)
Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
It's best to put the dimensions and you can see it easily, does that make sense?
Liv1234
  • Liv1234
Yes, it does. So, C is the answer?
Astrophysics
  • Astrophysics
So notice the proportion is the same but the scale factor has just changed, in this case reduced by 1/2. Yup, sounds good.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.