Why does Sin[x -c] Simplify to -Sin[c-x] ? I mean what would be the reason to not just leave it as x-c ?

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions.

A community for students.

Why does Sin[x -c] Simplify to -Sin[c-x] ? I mean what would be the reason to not just leave it as x-c ?

Mathematics
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

First sin function is an odd, so f(x) = -f(-x)
and you ca use trig identities to prove that also
well.. or one could use the "symmetry identities" and notice that sin(-a) = -sin(a) thus sin([x-c]) is also equals to sin(- [c -x]) which also would equal -sin([c-x]) or just -sin(c-x)

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

you could expand it if you wish anyhow, using the sum identity, and you'd end up with sin(x+c) keeping in mind that x+c is also equals to -(c-x) <--- expand that and you'd get x+c
hmm actuallly
x+c would equal -(-c-x) <--- expanding that would give x+c
Thanks guys.. now I understand the conversion process a bit better. I'm still a bit curious when mathematica is asked to simplify sin[x-c] why it chooses the -sin[c-x] form as the preferred form, this doesn't seem simplified to me. Is there a general rule that gives one form priority over the other?
It depends on what will you do with that expression or neighborhood expressions to make them look identical and factor out or something like that. anyway this example "for me" is meaningless as itself and the word simplify is ambiguous. So i would go with making it sin x cos c -cos x sin c
It's because it is easier to understand \(-\sin(x-c)\) as a function that is shifted and then reflected.
Basically, \(-\sin(x)\) is generally easier to evaluate than \(\sin(-x)\) because the table of \(\sin(x)\) values likely did not have negative \(x\) values as it would be redundant.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question