At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got 3/4 but im not sure if that is correct?
did you find the derivative of f(x)
How would you do that? Would it be |dw:1434601306329:dw|
no, not quite. You are finding the derivative by using the definition of a derivative. Have you learned the short hand way of finding derivatives by using the the derivative rules?
Would you do the power rule?
You would use the quotient rule
I dont know what that is
|dw:1434601640378:dw| ring a bell?
if it does not that is fine, we can work with the definition of a derivative.
|dw:1434601759504:dw| is where you would begin.
oh i just forgot to put it over h
then get the numerators to a common denominator
ok so you get (-3/x^2+xh - 3/x^2+xh) / h
which becomes (-6/x^2+xh ) / h ?
you forgot to multiply the top by what the value with which you multiplied the bottom
at the last step, you were supposed to get ((-3x/x^2+xh)-(-3(x+h)/x^2+xh))/h
Use L'Hopital's Rule to find derivative, then plug in -4. L'Hopital's Rule: (denominator * derivative of top)- (numerator * derivative of bottom)/(denominator^2) Derivative of -3/x= 3/x^2 Plug in (-4) = 3/16
|dw:1434602511993:dw| If you simplified everything correctly you should get
we are not done
now you have to cancel out the h and evaluate the limit to find your derivative, or did you use the other guy's method?