A community for students.

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

anonymous

  • one year ago

What is the converse of a statement that uses the form q if p? Since the conclusion is already first? Ex: Two segments are congruent if they have the same length. Would the converse still be: If two segments are congruent, then they have the same length? Forms of conditional statements: If p, then q. p implies q. p of if q. q if p.

  • This Question is Closed
  1. ybarrap
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    If p then q means that q is true if p is true. I will bring an umbrella if it rains is the same as If it rains I will bring an umbrella Conversely, would this be true? If I bring an umbrella then it will rain The answer is obviously NO So the converse is not always true However, if you know the converse is true, via proof/definition, then you can say p if q, which is the converse In your example about congruence, the converse statement would be valid because both q if p and p if q are true.

  2. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    To write converses, the conclusion is always first regardless of the order of it in the conditional statement right?

  3. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Because converses are "if conclusion, then hypotenuse."

  4. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    hypothesis* i mean, not hypotenuse

  5. Plasmataco
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    im pretty sure that converses and the original statement SOMETIMES contradict, so be aware

  6. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I'm just confused on how to write converses if the original statement's form is "q if p". I'm not concerned if the converse is true or false... Because in most conditional statements, the form is "if p, then q" and all you do for the converse is switch the order. But in a converse, the conclusion is always written first right?

  7. ybarrap
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    No, it can be written two ways p if q is the converse of q if p But p if q can also be written as if q then p and so in this case q came first. The most important is what follow the if statement and what is implied by it For example The converse of if it rains (p) then I will use an umbrella (q) can be written as p if q or if q then p or if I use and umbrella (q) then it will rain (p).

  8. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Oh, that makes more sense. Thank you very much for answering!

  9. ybarrap
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    You're welcome!

  10. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.