A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
anonymous
 one year ago
Can I get some help with a few questions?
anonymous
 one year ago
Can I get some help with a few questions?

This Question is Closed

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0One moment, need to screenshot!

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5two angles are supplementary, iff they add to 180°

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5iff \(\angle FEA\) is supplementary to \(\angle HGD\) \[\text m\angle FEA+\text m\angle HGD = 180°\]

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Wait.. I don't understand...

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5consider the first option, does it agree?

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5What is it that you don't understand?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Just the overall question. It's weird. It's not option A or B is what I'm getting so far, right?

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5(check carefully now) Does: \[\text m\angle FEA+\text m\angle HGD = 180°\] agree with option one?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0It.. it's not 180, I think..?

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5I suppose the first thing you have to realize is that any angle, can only have one supplement so iff ∠FEA is supplementary to ∠HGD then effectively A = C, B= D, E=G, F=H

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5there are only two angles to consider; the big one : ∠FEB = ∠HGD and the little angle : ∠FEA = ∠HGC

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5where any pair, of one big and one little angle, will always add to 180°,

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So A is not true, which makes it the right answer?

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5but why is A not true?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Because the angles are too big, right?

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5yeah, big angle + big angle ≠ 180°

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Okay, I kinda get it...

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0What about this problem?

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5(unless all the angles were exactly 90°, which doesn't fit the diagram )

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5[if i remember correctly] alternate angles are equal, corresponding angles are equal, vertically opposite angles are equal , & cointerior angles are supplementary.

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5can you find the angles in the first option on the diagram?

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5dw:1434794031396:dw

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0In the first one, they look equal to me.. unless I am not understanding this properly.

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5if they look equal (congruent), are they alternate angles? corresponding angles? vertically opposite angles ?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Alternate, I think..

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5u can't see any angles alternate to angle EIA

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So it's the first option, yes?

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5dw:1434794616346:dw

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5dw:1434794679515:dw

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Oh, so they're opposite angles?.. so they are congruent.

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Then there's this... I was always bad at these in class.

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5what is the difference between line 3, and line 4?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0They're adding segments together and asking if they're congruent.

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.53. AB + BC + CD = CD + DE + EF 4. AB + BC = DE + EF What has happened ?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0They're.. substituting I think?

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5what has been substituted for what?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0The concurrency, I think.

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.53. AB + BC + CD = CD + DE + EF 4. AB + BC = DE + EF how are theses lines different ?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Uh.. I have no legitimate clue.

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5read line 3. and then read line 4.

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0It removed two of the segments, I see that much.. :/

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0@TillLindemann no CD

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5yeas, CD has been taken away from both sides of the equation

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Okay.. so it's asking if they're still congruent without them, no?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So would it not be D?..

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5The question is , what reason justifies us being able to take away some term that appears on both sides of the equation

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So D, yes? I'm so confused.

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5another word for takeaway or minusing, is subtraction

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5does that makes sense now?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Yes, because they removed one of the segments, it makes it the Subtraction property, right?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0This is one of those ones where you have to do a bunch of weird nitpicking to get the correct answer...

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5Yes, the subtraction property of equality states that: if some expression is equal to some other expression, and both expressions have +some term, you can take away the +some term form both sides and the resulting expressions will still remain equal to one another A + c = c+ B (taking away c) A = B

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Not sure, but I think it's linear and angle BED...

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Er, not angle.. but.. you get what I'm trying to say.

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5what is the linear angle theorem?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0dw:1434796331473:dw This right?

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5that might be the linear angle theorem, but i don't see how it relates to this question

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5you got \(\angle AEC \cong \angle BED \) (by the vertical angle theorem) right

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5the linear angle theorem is not about congruence (equality), it is a about supplementary angles

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5compare the two lines of this question

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0And still angle BED, right?

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5yep they are vertically opposite angles in each case

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0This one is really long as well.

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5what do you think

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Well, I've had this question multiple times before and I always get it wrong...

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5i'm not going to tell you what the answer is

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I know that, but I haven't a single clue on how to find it..

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5Which parts of the closed passage do you not understand exactly?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Well, this whole section really.

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5first line says some lines are parallel, some angles are equal. prove some other angle are supplementry

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Yes, I think the first answer to the big question is transitive..

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5i think that is right, what about the next one

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5vertical angles are congrunent (not supplementary )

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0It's not linear, right?.. or is it?

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5Which do you think ?

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5dw:1434798665055:dw

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I think it's linear but I have no clue.. could be the congruent supplements one though.

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5the congruent supplements theorem involves three angles you have plenty of clues

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So then it is linear, no?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0And I think the last one is substitution, because it's assuming, and substituting numbers into the whole thing.

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5Yep substitution is right

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I think it's the first option...

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5that doesn't prove the what you are trying to prove

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5the last line of the proof should say something about what you are trying to prove

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0The congruent supplement one, yeah.. I think that's the right answer.

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5In this question you are trying to prove that \(\angle 3\cong \angle 6\), ... you have \(\angle 3\cong \angle 7\), ... you need something\(\cong\angle 6\), ...

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Now I feel like it's more option D...

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Well I don't understand.

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5\[\angle 3\cong \cdots\cong\angle6, ...\]

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0That doesn't help me.

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Because there is no option with 3 and 6 in it at the same time.

UnkleRhaukus
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5you have \[\angle 3\cong \angle 7, ...\] you need \[\angle 7\cong\angle6, ...\]

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Thank you. That's all I needed for now. Thanks so much for helping.
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.