anonymous
  • anonymous
ONLY NEED HELP WITH ONE HISTORY Q, BECAUSE HISTORY IS DEAD
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
I can help.
anonymous
  • anonymous
#2 ONLY : here is my answer so far:In the case Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, the Cherokee people were not getting the rights they deserved, all because Georgia passed a new law that they didn’t like. The Cherokee wanted justice, but got none. In this picture, Native Americans were getting forced off their land so that America could have it. In both cases, native people were not getting their rights.
anonymous
  • anonymous
1) The Indians are relocating.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
i only need #2 lol
anonymous
  • anonymous
Ooh.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I know the case was that the Indian's wanted the proper land that belonged to them, and I'd like to say that this relates to Nazi Germany(I am German, hah), claiming all the land around them, and plotting to claim all of Europe, but it want's a recent event, which I do not exactly understand that.
anonymous
  • anonymous
lol i am mostly german, so no shame :)
anonymous
  • anonymous
I live in Germany, aha. But honestly, that is all I can defer from this. It is a very awkward question.
anonymous
  • anonymous
@aaldia678 i only need hlp adjusting my #2 ^^
anonymous
  • anonymous
whats the question
anonymous
  • anonymous
in the pic/link in the above comment. my answer is in the box w/the pic :)
anonymous
  • anonymous
I took AP US history so I actually remember this case... the Cherokee nation actually wanted independence but the Supreme Court did not rule in their favor
anonymous
  • anonymous
In 1828, the state of Georgia passed a series of laws stripping local Cherokee Indians of their rights. The laws also authorized Cherokee removal from lands sought after by the state. In defense, the Cherokee cited treaties that they had negotiated, as an independent "nation," with the United States, guaranteeing the Cherokee nation both the land and independence. After failed negotiations with President Andrew Jackson and Congress, the Cherokee, under the leadership of John Ross, sought an injunction ("order to stop") at the Supreme Court against Georgia to prevent its carrying out these laws.
anonymous
  • anonymous
in 1830, Georgia passed another law requiring its citizens to obtain a state license before dwelling inside the Cherokee Nation.
anonymous
  • anonymous
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/supremecourt/antebellum/landmark_cherokee.html reading this could help

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.