Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
Use examples from the lessons and your own personal experiences to compose at least one well-developed paragraph on the following:
Explain how the U.S. Supreme court case United States v. Nixon has impacted society.
this might help http://www.ask.com/history/impact-united-states-v-nixon-64cb0daaf8db802b
The division of power in the U.S. government has always been a contentious issue, with the judicial, legislative and executive branches often disagreeing over limits on their particular powers. An early example of this disagreement occurred in 1796 when the House of Representatives demanded documents relating to the Jay Treaty that the Senate signed with Great Britain. President Washington refused to hand over those documents, arguing that the power to make treaties lay entirely with the Senate, and the House had no right to the requested information.
Nixon attempted a similar argument in claiming his own executive privilege. The requested recordings contained details that were relevant to prosecutions in the Watergate scandal, but the president argued that the information was not vital to the defendants' cases and he had the privilege of protecting internal White House communications. The Court ruled that accepting this privilege would amount to a blanket immunity from judicial review and prosecution and ruled against Nixon unanimously.