anonymous
  • anonymous
I WILL MEDAL!!!!! How has the U.S. Supreme court case United States v. Nixon has impacted society?
History
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
oh goodness...
anonymous
  • anonymous
Oh this one is hard...
anonymous
  • anonymous
agreed

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
But leave it to the 5000 year old wizard to tell you ;^)
anonymous
  • anonymous
;) lol ok i'll leave it to u to find the unknown answer ;DDD
anonymous
  • anonymous
it firmly established that the president of the United States could not use executive privilege as an absolute defense against judicial inquiry.
anonymous
  • anonymous
can i have a little more information plz?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Umm well ok
undeadknight26
  • undeadknight26
Plz pay extra for more info <3 LOLJK xD
anonymous
  • anonymous
The division of power in the U.S. government has always been a contentious issue, with the judicial, legislative and executive branches often disagreeing over limits on their particular powers. An early example of this disagreement occurred in 1796 when the House of Representatives demanded documents relating to the Jay Treaty that the Senate signed with Great Britain. President Washington refused to hand over those documents, arguing that the power to make treaties lay entirely with the Senate, and the House had no right to the requested information.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Nixon tried doing the same thing but it failed thus he resigned his position as a President
anonymous
  • anonymous
DarkMoonZ is right, basically it established that the president cannot just say "Hey, I'm the head executive of this country, so my decision tops everyone" If the judiciary systems says yes to a bill, the president cannot just say no with the only reason being that he is the president. He needs justifiable means.
anonymous
  • anonymous
k thx :D
anonymous
  • anonymous
No problem ;^)

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.