Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

## More answers

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

- calculusxy

A graph sketch tells what quantities the axes represent but does not have specific number scales. Both of these graph sketched show that distance increases as time passes. Which graph sketch better represents a walk? Why?

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions.

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions

- calculusxy

- schrodinger

See more answers at brainly.com

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions

- calculusxy

- calculusxy

- calculusxy

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

- anonymous

We would expect that our walk should be continuous rather than discrete. We can test this by seeing whether there should be "gaps" as shown in one of the graphs.
Does it make sense to ask the distance we have travelled after 3 seconds? It does, so it would make sense to connect the points.

- calculusxy

I still don't understand.

- anonymous

Does it make sense to ask the distance we have travelled after 3 seconds*? It does, so it would make sense to connect the points.
*notice that there is no dot at three seconds on the second graph, or 3.5 seconds, or 3.231 seconds, but there should be if it really is a good model of our scenario

- calculusxy

Okay thank you.

- anonymous

No worries. Does that make sense?

- calculusxy

Yes

- Michele_Laino

I think that the first graph is the better one, since the distance traveled by a particle, is a continuous variable, and not a discrete variable, as we can see from the second graph

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.