At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
Use the figure to answer the question that follows: Segments UV and WZ are parallel with line ST intersecting both at points Q and R respectively When written in the correct order, the two-column proof below describes the statements and reasons for proving that corresponding angles are congruent: Statements Reasons segment UV is parallel to segment WZ Given Points S, Q, R, and T all lie on the same line. Given I m∠SQV + m∠VQT = 180° Substitution Property of Equality II m∠SQT = 180° Definition of a Straight Angle III m∠SQV + m∠VQT = m∠SQT Angle Addition Postulate m∠VQT + m∠ZRS = 180° Same-Side Interior Angles Theorem m∠SQV + m∠VQT = m∠VQT + m∠ZRS Substitution Property of Equality m∠SQV + m∠VQT − m∠VQT = m∠VQT + m∠ZRS − m∠VQT m∠SQV = m∠ZRS Subtraction Property of Equality ∠SQV ≅ ∠ZRS Definition of Congruency Which is the most logical order of statements and reasons I, II, and III to complete the proof? I, III, II II, I, III II, III, I III, I, II
draw it out.
but i have no idea on how to even start to
i do know its prob B or C from elimination
try to draw it out first... it will help
how do i draw it out like what do you mean
did they give you an image?
that would help
and could you just see if i got this other one right please
what other one
The following is an incorrect flowchart proving that point L, lying on line LM which is a perpendicular bisector of segment JK, is equidistant from points J and K: Segment JK intersects line LM at point N Line LM is a perpendicular bisector of segment JK, Given. Two arrows are drawn from this statement to the following two statements. Angle LNK equals 90 degrees and angle LNJ equals 90 degrees, Definition of a Perpendicular Bisector. Segment JN is congruent to segment NK, Definition of a Perpendicular Bisector. Angle LNK is congruent to angle LNJ, Definition of Congruence. Segment LN is congruent to segment LN, Reflexive Property of Equality. Draw segment JL and segment KL, by Construction. Four arrows from the previous four statements are drawn to the statement triangle JNL is congruent to triangle KNL, Side Angle Side, SAS Postulate. An arrow from this statement is drawn to the statement segment JL is congruent to segment KL, Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent CPCTC. An arrow from this statement is drawn to JL equals KL, Definition of Congruence. An arrow from this statement is drawn to Point L is equidistant from points J and K, Definition of Equidistant. What is the error in this flowchart? JL and KL are equal in length, according to the definition of a midpoint. An arrow is missing between ∠LNK = 90° and ∠LNJ = 90° and ∠LNK ≅ ∠LNJ. An arrow is missing between the given statement and ∠LNK ≅ ∠LNJ. Triangles JNL and KNL are congruent by the Angle-Angle Side (AAS) Postulate.
i think it is too but im not positive
humm alright well thanks though