anonymous
  • anonymous
helpppppp please
Mathematics
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

anonymous
  • anonymous
with?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Use the figure to answer the question that follows: Segments UV and WZ are parallel with line ST intersecting both at points Q and R respectively When written in the correct order, the two-column proof below describes the statements and reasons for proving that corresponding angles are congruent: Statements Reasons segment UV is parallel to segment WZ Given Points S, Q, R, and T all lie on the same line. Given I m∠SQV + m∠VQT = 180° Substitution Property of Equality II m∠SQT = 180° Definition of a Straight Angle III m∠SQV + m∠VQT = m∠SQT Angle Addition Postulate m∠VQT + m∠ZRS = 180° Same-Side Interior Angles Theorem m∠SQV + m∠VQT = m∠VQT + m∠ZRS Substitution Property of Equality m∠SQV + m∠VQT − m∠VQT = m∠VQT + m∠ZRS − m∠VQT m∠SQV = m∠ZRS Subtraction Property of Equality ∠SQV ≅ ∠ZRS Definition of Congruency Which is the most logical order of statements and reasons I, II, and III to complete the proof? I, III, II II, I, III II, III, I III, I, II
egbeach
  • egbeach
draw it out.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
but i have no idea on how to even start to
anonymous
  • anonymous
i do know its prob B or C from elimination
egbeach
  • egbeach
try to draw it out first... it will help
anonymous
  • anonymous
how do i draw it out like what do you mean
egbeach
  • egbeach
did they give you an image?
anonymous
  • anonymous
oh that
egbeach
  • egbeach
that would help
anonymous
  • anonymous
1 Attachment
egbeach
  • egbeach
b
anonymous
  • anonymous
how
anonymous
  • anonymous
and could you just see if i got this other one right please
egbeach
  • egbeach
what other one
anonymous
  • anonymous
The following is an incorrect flowchart proving that point L, lying on line LM which is a perpendicular bisector of segment JK, is equidistant from points J and K: Segment JK intersects line LM at point N Line LM is a perpendicular bisector of segment JK, Given. Two arrows are drawn from this statement to the following two statements. Angle LNK equals 90 degrees and angle LNJ equals 90 degrees, Definition of a Perpendicular Bisector. Segment JN is congruent to segment NK, Definition of a Perpendicular Bisector. Angle LNK is congruent to angle LNJ, Definition of Congruence. Segment LN is congruent to segment LN, Reflexive Property of Equality. Draw segment JL and segment KL, by Construction. Four arrows from the previous four statements are drawn to the statement triangle JNL is congruent to triangle KNL, Side Angle Side, SAS Postulate. An arrow from this statement is drawn to the statement segment JL is congruent to segment KL, Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent CPCTC. An arrow from this statement is drawn to JL equals KL, Definition of Congruence. An arrow from this statement is drawn to Point L is equidistant from points J and K, Definition of Equidistant. What is the error in this flowchart? JL and KL are equal in length, according to the definition of a midpoint. An arrow is missing between ∠LNK = 90° and ∠LNJ = 90° and ∠LNK ≅ ∠LNJ. An arrow is missing between the given statement and ∠LNK ≅ ∠LNJ. Triangles JNL and KNL are congruent by the Angle-Angle Side (AAS) Postulate.
anonymous
  • anonymous
i think its C
1 Attachment
egbeach
  • egbeach
i think it is too but im not positive
anonymous
  • anonymous
humm alright well thanks though

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.