## anonymous one year ago Once again I don't know what this has to deal with math but it does.... Which of the following is a logical conclusion based on the two statements below? If Hannah does her homework, then her math grade will improve. Hannah has been doing her homework. A. Hannah had no homework assignments this week. B. Hannah's math grade has not improved. C. Hannah's math grade has improved. D. Hannah had too many homework assignments this week

1. phi

this is logic, and is studied as part of math. if p then q sometimes written $p\rightarrow q = \neg p \vee q$

2. anonymous

I honestly don't understand it... i'm terrible at math

3. phi

if they tell you p->q is true and p is true (so not p is false) then by the "equation", q must be true i.e. this $true = false \vee q$ requires q to be true

4. phi

In some way, it is common sense. if you know study -> better grades and you are told she studied, then you conclude she got better grades. but logic can be tricky, so I posted some stuff that may or may not be useful.

5. anonymous

I thought it was C but I didn't know because of the way it was worded

6. phi

yes, choice C

7. anonymous

thank you