A community for students.

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

anonymous

  • one year ago

A small sphere with mass 5.00.×10−7kg and charge +3.00μC is released from rest a distance of 0.600 m above a large horizontal insulating sheet of charge that has uniform surface charge density σ=+8.00pC/m2. a)Using energy methods, calculate the speed of the sphere when it is 0.250 m above the sheet of charge? I just need help understanding what I have to do to get the speed. I tried finding the difference in potential to calculate the Work done and then find the final velocity from that. I tried using conservation of energy using Electric Potential energy, gravitational PE and KE.

  • This Question is Open
  1. IrishBoy123
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    devil might be in detail. what are you using for the electrical field of the sheet?

  2. Nurali
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    http://openstudy.com/study#/updates/4f54fc54e4b01ed6138379db

  3. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    use Gauss' Law to obtain E above the sheet; is E up, or is E down? Is the Electric Force up, or down?

  4. Michele_Laino
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    the situation described in your problem is: |dw:1436512391791:dw|

  5. Michele_Laino
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    of course, we can neglect the weight force of our point-like charge. Furthermore, we have the subsequent equations: \[\Large \begin{gathered} v = \frac{{qE}}{m}t \hfill \\ \hfill \\ z = {z_0} + \frac{1}{2}\frac{{qE}}{m}{t^2} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \] where: \[\Large \begin{gathered} q = 3 \times {10^{ - 6}}coulombs \hfill \\ \\ E = \frac{\sigma }{{{\varepsilon _0}}} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \]

  6. Michele_Laino
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    here, you have to solve the second equation for t, namley: \[\Large t = \sqrt {\frac{{2m}}{{qE}}\left( {z - {z_0}} \right)} \] where z=0.250 meters then you have to substitute the resultant value, into the first equation: \[\Large v = \frac{{qE}}{m}t\]

  7. Michele_Laino
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1436513140003:dw|

  8. alekos
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    The force due to gravity is greater than the force due to the electric field so it will accelerate towards the sheet with a total force of 2.17E-6 N Ft = Fg - Fe = mg - σq/ε

  9. alekos
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Then use v^2 = 2as to find the velocity where a = Ft/m and s = 0.6-0.25

  10. IrishBoy123
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    +1 @Alekos agree apart from the field. => E = σq/2ε approach gives "sensible answers" too

    1 Attachment
  11. alekos
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yes you're right! E = σ/2ε for a very large flat sheet. my mistake, thanks

  12. Michele_Laino
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    oops..the weight force is not neglectable, so the right equation of motion are: \[\Large \begin{gathered} v = \left( {\frac{{qE}}{m} - g} \right)t \hfill \\ \\ z = {z_0} + \frac{1}{2}\left( {\frac{{qE}}{m} - g} \right){t^2} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \] where g is the earth gravity |dw:1436545462855:dw|

  13. Michele_Laino
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    of course those equation are compatible with your data, if: \[\Large \frac{{qE}}{m} - g < 0\]

  14. IrishBoy123
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    of course, the OP specified "Using energy methods" so instead, and using @Michele_Laino 's handy raference system [z points upwards], we can say: \(\frac{1}{2}m \dot z^2 - \frac{q \sigma}{2 \epsilon}z + mgz = const\) "if" the sphere moves upwards or downwards, it increases its KE. if it goes up [z increases], it loses electrical PE [as two repelling +ve charges are further apart] but gains gravitational potential [as 2 "attractive" masses are further apart]. And vice versa. we can then differentiate this wrt t [and we should go back to the force equations]: \(2 (\frac{1}{2})m \dot z \ddot z - \frac{q \sigma}{2 \epsilon} \dot z + mg \dot z = 0\) \(m \ddot z - \frac{q \sigma}{2 \epsilon} + mg = 0\) \( \ddot z = \frac{q \sigma}{2 \epsilon m} - g\) \( \dot z = v = [\frac{q \sigma}{2 \epsilon m} - g] t\)

  15. IrishBoy123
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    forgive any typo's

  16. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.