Consider this claim:
Students who do not have at least a 3.0 GPA should not be allowed to have after-school jobs because they need to spend more time studying. Use the 5-step process to write a counterclaim.
Complete the following sentence: The claim states that …
Cross out "The claim states that." What remains is your clearly stated position.
Complete the following sentence: Some may disagree because …
Cross out "Some may disagree because." What remains is your purpose for writing.
Combine these two thoughts; this is your claim and your counterclaim.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
do u have any of it done or do u need help with all of it?
Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.
1) the claim states that students without a 3.0 should not have an after school jobs because they need more studying time
2) just cross out the claim states that
3) Some my disagree because they do not have a 3.0 and need money so they disagree
4)cross out some my disagree and that's ur sentence
5)Students without a 3.0 should not have an after school job because they need mor studying time, they do not have a 3.0 and need money so they disagree