Loser66
  • Loser66
1)Reduce to a linear system of first order \(\dfrac{d^2x}{dt^2}=a\dfrac{dx}{dt}+bx+c\); \(x(0) =u\); \(\dfrac{dx}{dt}(0) =v\) 2) Solve, using Laplace transform Please, help
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
Loser66
  • Loser66
@Empty
alekos
  • alekos
well, we could integrate both sides of the DE \[\int\limits x'' = \int\limits ax' + \int\limits bx + \int\limits c \]
Empty
  • Empty
I don't think that's the way to go here, can you use the rules for laplace transforms or what level of sophistication are you allowed to use here?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

Loser66
  • Loser66
It becomes \(x' = ax + bx^2/2 + cx\) which is not linear!!
Loser66
  • Loser66
\(x" -ax'-bx =c\) . Can we solve the homogeneous part to get one of the solution, then use reduction of order to get the required form?
Empty
  • Empty
I don't know, I am not too familiar with reduction of order I'm afraid but what you described sounds good. Actually you could potentially turn this into a system of equations and solve it that way, it's been a while so I'm a little rusty.
Loser66
  • Loser66
Let me think more. Thanks for being here.:)
Empty
  • Empty
Haha yeah no problem, I need to practice for sure
Empty
  • Empty
Ok I see now.
Empty
  • Empty
We need to turn it into a system of 1st order equations. We do this by doing a standard technique of doing this substitution: \[u=x\]\[v=x'\] Take the derivative of both of these to get: \[u'=x'\]\[v'=x''\] Now we combine them together for the first equation, and then we take our differential equation \(x''=ax'+bx+c\) and substitute these in to get the second equation: \[u'=v\]\[v'=av+bu+c\] So that completes part a. :)
Loser66
  • Loser66
You assume u and v are not constant, right? but we have x(0) = u, that is a constant, not a function to take derivative. Am I right?
Empty
  • Empty
They're not constants, specifically they depend on t. \[u(t)=x(t)\]\[v(t)=x'(t)\] If they were constants, taking their derivatives would also have given us zero above when I differentiated both of them. :)
Empty
  • Empty
The main point is to get a system of equations where you have a derivative equal to things that aren't derivatives, like I've shown above. For example I could have written: \[v'=au'+bu+c\] but then that would mess up the system of equations and make it not so pretty, we want that \(u'=v\) so we can write just \[v'=av+bu+c\]
Loser66
  • Loser66
Let me try other way, if we meet at the result, we are done Let \(y_1(t) = x(t)\\y_2(t) = x'(t)\) then \( y_1'(t) =y_2(t)\) and \(y_2' = ay_2+by_1+c\) Ah!! the same with you.
Loser66
  • Loser66
ok, thanks a ton. lalalala...
Empty
  • Empty
Awesome good job! :) Now how I would solve this is to plug this in a matrix but I don't think that's what they want you to do
Loser66
  • Loser66
Now adding the condition, \(y_1(0) = x(0) = u\\y_2(0) = x'(0) =v\)
Loser66
  • Loser66
for part 2) they ask me to solve by Laplace transform, not matrix.
Empty
  • Empty
Well should be possible now, go ahead and try to solve the new system and I can try to help you if you need it.
Loser66
  • Loser66
wait, new or original one?
alekos
  • alekos
i think they're asking for the original equation
alekos
  • alekos
which is why you would need the initial conditions
Empty
  • Empty
Here, this is exactly the method I would use to solve this, go ahead and see if you can figure it out from here and I can help you fill in the details if you're still struggling. http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1068473/how-to-solve-a-linear-system-in-matrix-form-using-laplace-transform
Loser66
  • Loser66
Thanks a lot. I am reading.
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
.
anonymous
  • anonymous
to reduce to a linear system of first order, you just need to decouple it into two linear (NOT affine) equations, one in \(x'=x+c/b\) and one in \(y=dx/dt\):$$\dfrac{d^2x}{dt^2}=a\dfrac{dx}{dt}+bx+c\implies \left\{\begin{array}{ll}\frac{dx}{dt}=y\\\frac{dy}{dt}=bx'+ay\end{array}\right.$$ which gives:$$\begin{bmatrix}0&1\\b&a\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x'\\y\end{bmatrix}=\frac{d}{dt}\begin{bmatrix}x'\\y\end{bmatrix}$$in matrix form; we can take the Laplace transform row-by-row, with \(X(s)=\mathcal{L}\{x\},Y(s)=\mathcal{L}\{y\}\)$$\begin{bmatrix}0&1\\b&a\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}X\\Y\end{bmatrix}=s\begin{bmatrix}X\\Y\end{bmatrix}-\begin{bmatrix}x'(0)\\y(0)\end{bmatrix}\\s\begin{bmatrix}X\\Y\end{bmatrix}-\begin{bmatrix}0&1\\b&a\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}X\\Y\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}x'(0)\\y(0)\end{bmatrix}\\\begin{bmatrix}s&0\\0&s\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}X\\Y\end{bmatrix}-\begin{bmatrix}0&1\\b&a\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}X\\Y\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}x'(0)\\y(0)\end{bmatrix}\\\begin{bmatrix}s&-1\\-b&s-a\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}X\\Y\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}x'(0)\\y(0)\end{bmatrix}\\\begin{bmatrix}X\\Y\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}s&-1\\-b&s-a\end{bmatrix}^{-1}\begin{bmatrix}x'(0)\\y(0)\end{bmatrix}\\\begin{bmatrix}X\\Y\end{bmatrix}=\frac1{s(s-a)-b}\begin{bmatrix}s-a&b\\1&s\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x'(0)\\y(0)\end{bmatrix}\\\begin{bmatrix}X\\Y\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}\frac{s-a}{s(s-a)-b}&\frac{b}{s(s-a)-b}\\\frac1{s(s-a)-b}&-\frac{s}{s(s-a)-b}\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}u+c/b\\v\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}(u+c/b)\frac{s-a}{s(s-a)-b}+v\frac{b}{s(s-a)-b}\\(u+c/b)\frac1{s(s-a)-b}-v\frac{s}{s(s-a)-b}\end{bmatrix}$$so let's look at these expressions in more detail: $$\frac1{s(s-a)-b}=\frac1{s^2-as-b}\\\quad=\frac1{(s-a/2)^2-(b+a^2/4)}$$so now recall $$\mathcal{L}^{-1}\left\{\frac{\sqrt{b+a^2/4}}{(s-a/2)^2-(b+a^2/4)}\right\}=e^{at/2}\sinh\left(t\sqrt{b+a^2/4}\right)=S(t)\\\mathcal{L}^{-1}\left\{\frac{s-a/2}{(s-a/2)^2-(b+a^2/4)}\right\}=e^{at/2}\cosh\left(t\sqrt{b+a^2/4}\right)=C(t)$$so it follows that $$\frac1{(s-a/2)^2-(b+a^2/4)}\to \frac2{\sqrt{4b+a^2}}S(t)\\\frac{s}{(s-a/2)^2-(b+a^2/4)}\to C(t)+\frac{a}{\sqrt{4b+a^2}}S(t)\\\frac{s-a}{(s-a/2)^2-(b+a^2/4)}\to C(t)-\frac{a}{\sqrt{4b+a^2}}S(t)$$ so we find that the inverse transform gives us: $$x'=\left(u+c/b\right)C(t)+\frac{2vb-a(u+c/b)}{\sqrt{4b+a^2}}S(t)$$and then $$\boxed{x(t)=-c/b+e^{at/2}\left((u+c/b)\cosh\left(\frac12 t\sqrt{4b+a^2}\right)\\\qquad\qquad\qquad+(2vb-au-ac/b)\sinh\left(\frac12 t\sqrt{4b+a^2}\right)\right)}$$
Loser66
  • Loser66
Thanks for the solution. I have question on it. 1)...which gives .. \[\begin{bmatrix}0&1\\b&a\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x'\\y\end{bmatrix}=\frac{d}{dt}\begin{bmatrix}x'\\y\end{bmatrix}\] I think there is mistake there at the right hand side. It should be \(\dfrac{d}{dt}\left[\begin{matrix}x\\y\end{matrix}\right]\), not x', right?
anonymous
  • anonymous
it is \(x'\) because \(x'=x+c/b\) to convert the system into a linear one

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.