anonymous
  • anonymous
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Which of the following possible court cases could be argued under the terms of the quote above?
History
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
a. a person sues the state for building an armory on nearby property b. a person refuses to serve the military when called up through a draft c. a person shoots and kills someone who broke into the family's home d. a person rejects police requests to unlock the car doors and windows i think its d
anonymous
  • anonymous
@misssunshinexxoxo
misssunshinexxoxo
  • misssunshinexxoxo
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, "

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

misssunshinexxoxo
  • misssunshinexxoxo
D seems to agree with it though
misssunshinexxoxo
  • misssunshinexxoxo
"could be argued under the terms of the quote above?" C seems more probable
anonymous
  • anonymous
c seems right
misssunshinexxoxo
  • misssunshinexxoxo
The quote agrees with D. When they call in a swat team to take evidence after a murder. They don't generally need a search warrant.
misssunshinexxoxo
  • misssunshinexxoxo
C is more likely to be probable
anonymous
  • anonymous
oh okai ... can u help me with some more if i make them new questions?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.