anonymous
  • anonymous
The sum of K consecutive integers is 41. If the least integer is -40, then k?
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Here's a way of thinking about this. If you're adding consecutive integers and the first is -41, then you're adding:\[-41+(-40)+(-39)+(-38)+...=41\]However, at some point, you're going to get into the positive numbers when you're adding.\[-41+(-40)+(-39)+...+(-3)+(-2)+(-1)+(0)+(1)+(2)+(3)+...=41\]At the point where you get to the positive numbers, the negatives and positives will begin to cancel out. This is because -3 + 3 = 0, -2 + 2 = 0, -1 + 1 = 0. Does this help you with the rest of the problem?
anonymous
  • anonymous
The cutoff part says \(+...=41\)
phi
  • phi
the least number is -40

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

misty1212
  • misty1212
oops
anonymous
  • anonymous
Ok, if the first numebr is -40, just omit the -41 in my equations.
dan815
  • dan815
does that equation work
anonymous
  • anonymous
hmmmmm so it's 41 then?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Not quite. 41 would be the last term that you would be adding to get the sum to be 41. However, k is the number of numbers you're adding.
anonymous
  • anonymous
ohhhhh crap .... it's 81
anonymous
  • anonymous
-40 to 0 is 41 numbers. 1 to 41 is 41 numbers. So, 41 + 41 should be what k is. Is this making sense to you?
freckles
  • freckles
\[\sum_{i=1}^k(-40+i)=41 \\ -40k+\frac{k(k+1)}{2}=41\]
freckles
  • freckles
it is a quadratic equation
anonymous
  • anonymous
hmmm you know what i do is i add 41 to -40 and then multiply by 81
freckles
  • freckles
I think I should have started it at i=0
anonymous
  • anonymous
The key here is that they are "consecutive" integers. That's why just multiplying like that doesn't work.
freckles
  • freckles
\[-40(k+1)+\frac{k(k+1)}{2}=41\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
crap so it's 82
freckles
  • freckles
almost
anonymous
  • anonymous
huh?
anonymous
  • anonymous
@freckles I got 82 as well. Might've had an error though.
freckles
  • freckles
you said 81 earlier that is right
freckles
  • freckles
that is what you get when you solve that quadratic equation above \[\sum_{i=0}^k (-40+i)\] this does mean -40+(-39)+(-38)+...+(-40+k) or if you used those formula things you can write that sum thingy as \[-40(k+1)+\frac{k(k+1)}{2} \text{ which we want to this output } 41 \\ \text{ so we need \to solve } \\ -40(k+1)+\frac{k(k+1)}{2}=41\]
freckles
  • freckles
\[\frac{-80(k+1)}{2}+\frac{k(k+1)}{2}=41 \\ \frac{(k+1)}{2}(-80+k)=41 \\ (k+1)(-80+k)=82 \\ k^2-79k-80=82 \\ k^2-79k-80-82=0 \\ k^2-79k-162=0 \\ (k+2)(k-81)=0\]
freckles
  • freckles
only one of these k's make sense
dan815
  • dan815
82 is right i believe
dan815
  • dan815
|dw:1436823495199:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
@freckles You can use the sum of an arithmetic series.\[a_k=-40, -39, ...\]\[S_k=\frac{k}{2}(2a_1+(k-1)d)\]\[41=\frac{k}{2}(k-81)\]\[82=k^2-81k\]\[0=k^2-81k-82\]\[0=(k-82)(k+1)\]\[k=-1 ~or ~82\]And -1 is extraneous.
anonymous
  • anonymous
If you prefer the algebraic method.
freckles
  • freckles
I gave an algebraic method above 81 works
freckles
  • freckles
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sum%28-40%2Bi%2Ci%3D0..k%29%3D41
anonymous
  • anonymous
By starting at i = 0, the number of terms in that series is actually k + 1. I think that's the error.
anonymous
  • anonymous
thanks everyone.
dan815
  • dan815
yeah 82 is right
freckles
  • freckles
then why is wolfram saying 81 that is weird
dan815
  • dan815
freckles the indice starts at 0
dan815
  • dan815
not 1
anonymous
  • anonymous
The number of terms can easily be calculated by b-a+1 given\[\sum_{a}^{b}\]What you used equates to k+1 terms.
dan815
  • dan815
|dw:1436823854020:dw|
freckles
  • freckles
so I should have used this: \[\sum_{i=1}^{k}(-40+(i-1)) =41 \\ -40k+\frac{k(k+1)}{2}-k =41 \] i think this should arrive to the correct answer and yes this is k terms now my bad
freckles
  • freckles
\[-80k+k(k+1)-2k=82 \\ k^2+k-82k=82 \\ k^2-81k-82=0 \\ (k-82)(k+1)=0\]

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.