mathmath333
  • mathmath333
Solve
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
mathmath333
  • mathmath333
\(\large \color{black}{\begin{align} 2x^2+\dfrac{1}{x}\gt0\hspace{.33em}\\~\\ \end{align}}\)
Sepeario
  • Sepeario
x>0 is a solution.
MrNood
  • MrNood
multiply both side od inequality by x subtract 1 from both sides divide both sides by 2 take cube root

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

freckles
  • freckles
@MrNood if we multiply both sides by x. We have two cases. x is positive and x is negative.
freckles
  • freckles
if we assume x is positive the inequality sign's direction holds if we assume x is negative we flip the inequality sign's direction
freckles
  • freckles
if you want to avoid that can you try multiplying x^2 on both sides instead
mathmath333
  • mathmath333
how to solve this \(x^3+\dfrac12>0\)
freckles
  • freckles
subtracting 1/2 on both sides then taking cube root of both sides
mathmath333
  • mathmath333
u mean this ? \(\large \color{black}{\begin{align} x>\left(-\dfrac12\right)^{1/3}\hspace{.33em}\\~\\ \end{align}}\) x can only have real values
freckles
  • freckles
that is right
freckles
  • freckles
and since ()^(1/3) is an odd function you can actually bring the negative outside if you prefer
freckles
  • freckles
\[x>- \frac{1}{2^\frac{1}{3}}\]
mathmath333
  • mathmath333
but wolfram gives it as complex number http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%5Cleft%28-%5Cdfrac12%5Cright%29%5E%7B1%2F3%7D%3D
freckles
  • freckles
yes there are complex cube roots of -1/2 but you want the real cube root of -1/2
freckles
  • freckles
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=real+cube+root+of+%28-1%2F2%29
mathmath333
  • mathmath333
can this be done in case of square root too ?
freckles
  • freckles
what do you mean exactly ?
mathmath333
  • mathmath333
this one http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=real+square+root+of+%28-1%2F2%29
freckles
  • freckles
short answer: no there is no real square root of -1/2 here is a long answer involving demorive' theorem \[\frac{-1}{2}=\frac{1}{2}(\cos(\pi+2\pi n)+i \sin(\pi+2 \pi n) ) \\ \frac{-1}{2}=\frac{1}{2}e^{(\pi+2n \pi)i} \\ \text{ taking \square \root of both sides } \\ \sqrt{\frac{-1}{2}}=(\frac{1}{2})^\frac{1}{2}e^{\frac{1}{2}(\pi+2n \pi)i} \text{ note: just raised both sides \to } \frac{1}{2} \\ \sqrt{\frac{-1}{2}}=(\frac{1}{2})^\frac{1}{2}e^{\frac{1}{2} (\pi i)} = (\frac{1}{2})^\frac{1}{2}(\cos(\frac{\pi}{2})+i \sin(\frac{\pi}{2})) =(\frac{1}{2})^\frac{1}{2}(0+i)=(\frac{1}{2})^\frac{1}{2} i \\ \sqrt{\frac{-1}{2}}=(\frac{1}{2})^\frac{1}{2}e^{\frac{1}{2}(\pi+2 \pi)}=(\frac{1}{2})^\frac{1}{2}(\cos(\frac{3\pi}{2})+i \sin(\frac{3 \pi}{2}))=(\frac{1}{2})^\frac{1}{2}(-1i)\] in other words square root of a negative number is only going to lead to imaginary numbers
freckles
  • freckles
though that was an answer involving trig I think I can also give you a good algebraic reasoning that has nothing to do with trig the sqrt(x) function looks like this: |dw:1436970600020:dw| this doesn't exist to the left of the y-axis so sqrt(-1) is not going to have a real answer but cuberoot(x) function looks like this: |dw:1436970632089:dw|
freckles
  • freckles
the cube function actually does exist to the left of the y-axis
mathmath333
  • mathmath333
u mean even roots dont have real roots
freckles
  • freckles
I think I said square roots
freckles
  • freckles
yes i did that is what I meant
freckles
  • freckles
square root of negative numbers aren't real
mathmath333
  • mathmath333
i mean if \(\Large a^{1/b}\) if b is even then there is no real root ?
freckles
  • freckles
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=4th+roots+of+%28-1%2F2%29 though if you get into higher roots we can also use demorive' theorem to show this but I actually think you are only suppose to consider real function and real roots
MrNood
  • MrNood
all even roots are roots of the square root - so if the squre root is not real neither is any even root
freckles
  • freckles
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=6th+roots+of+%28-1%2F2%29 yes even roots of negative numbers aren't going to have real and the word even means also two which we call the square root
freckles
  • freckles
the example I showed though was of the square root of a negative number since you asked about sqrt(-1/2)
mathmath333
  • mathmath333
ok next qustion \(\large \color{black}{\begin{align} \dfrac{(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)}{(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)}>1\hspace{.33em}\\~\\ \end{align}}\)
freckles
  • freckles
I would probably end up subtracting 1 on both sides and combining the fractions but that seems really long
freckles
  • freckles
only because there is so much multiplication we have to do in the numerator
freckles
  • freckles
\[\frac{(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)-(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)}{(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)} >0\] like you have to multiply (x-1)(x-2)(x-3) and multiply (x+1)(x+2)(x+3) combine like terms on top there might be a little trick to making a short cut like if you already know the top isn't going to have any 0's but I don't see how to do that without actually multiplying it all out and combing like terms anyways the bottom is easy to see where we have vertical asymptotes since (x+1)(x+2)(x+3)=0 is easy to solve
freckles
  • freckles
I would draw a number line and test intervals around those vertical asymptotes and any 0's if they do exist
mathmath333
  • mathmath333
there will come a cubic polynomial in numerator , how will i factor that
freckles
  • freckles
you get a cubic poly in the numerator ?
freckles
  • freckles
I think the x^3 will cancel in the top
mathmath333
  • mathmath333
oh i see its not cubic
freckles
  • freckles
\[(x-1)(x-2)(x-3) \\ =(x^2-3x+2)(x-3) \\ =x^3-3x^2+2x-3x^2-9x-6 \\ =x^3-6x^2-7x-6 \\ (x+1)(x+2)(x+3) \\ =(x^2+3x+2)(x+3) \\ =x^3+3x^2+2x+3x^2+9x+6 \\ =x^3+6x^2+11x+6\] might check my arithmetic
mathmath333
  • mathmath333
ok its easy nnow
freckles
  • freckles
darn it
freckles
  • freckles
I didn't multiply -3x(-3) correctly
ikram002p
  • ikram002p
|dw:1436971504692:dw|
freckles
  • freckles
\[(x-1)(x-2)(x-3) \\ =(x^2-3x+2)(x-3) \\ =x^3-3x^2+2x-3x^2+9x-6 \\ =x^3-6x^2+11x-6 \\ (x+1)(x+2)(x+3) \\ =(x^2+3x+2)(x+3) \\ =x^3+3x^2+2x+3x^2+9x+6 \\ =x^3+6x^2+11x+6\]
ikram002p
  • ikram002p
|dw:1436971702003:dw|
ikram002p
  • ikram002p
if you are not struggling with my graph then my solution would be x>0 and \(x <\frac{ -1 }{ \sqrt[3]{2} }\)
freckles
  • freckles
yep yep on that one I liked multiplying both sides by x^2 and drawing a number line
ikram002p
  • ikram002p
by x not x^2*
freckles
  • freckles
\[2x^4+x>0 \\ x(2x^3+1)>0 \\ x(2x^3+1)=0 \text{ when } x=0 \text{ or } x=\frac{-1}{\sqrt[3]{2}} \approx -.79 \\ \] |dw:1436972007081:dw|
freckles
  • freckles
no by x^2
freckles
  • freckles
you can also choose to multiply both sides by x but then you have cases
freckles
  • freckles
we see that the function is only positive on (-inf,-1/cubeoot(2)) union (0,infty) just as you got
ikram002p
  • ikram002p
oh im referring to the origin didnt see other stuff :)
freckles
  • freckles
I didn't actually solve it I just suggested multiplying both sides by x^2 and that was all I like to avoid those cases sometimes

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.