elcna
  • elcna
Can someone check my answer, please? :) 1. One way in which experimental research differs from observational research is that only experimental research can *show cause and effect *test a hypothesis <<< *produce scientific results *support a theory I was caught between A & B, but I'm thinking B?
Biology
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
NathalyN
  • NathalyN
One way in which experimental research differs from observational research is that only experimental research can show cause and effect
anonymous
  • anonymous
NathalyN is correct the correct answer is A show cause and effect
anonymous
  • anonymous
The key is in "show". Here it is a synonym for "demonstrate". How would you demonstrate something if you ware just observing?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

Rushwr
  • Rushwr
I think it is B because we do an experimental research to test the hypothesis right? And besides by using the observational hypothesis we can't test the hypothesis.
anonymous
  • anonymous
To reply to this question, I will try to apply a method. I'll wonder for each eventual answer: 1/ if observation can 2/ if experimenting can. *show cause and effect --> I think you can see causes and effects by observing. For instance, you show your dog a sausage (cause), and it salivates (effect), like in the Pavolov experience. *test a hypothesis ---> To test hypothesis, you need experimenting you can't test hypothesis just by observing. *produce scientific results ---> To produce scientific results, you need to test, to experiment. *support a theory ---> you have to make a theory and test it, so I think you need experimenting. I'm not sure of my answers, but I'm sure the method is good. Try it.
anonymous
  • anonymous
So my answers are, experimenting is necessary for: - testing an hypothesis - producing scientific results - supporting a theory.
anonymous
  • anonymous
*Pavlov
anonymous
  • anonymous
Maybe it's all the answers, if the word "show" means demonstrate. English is my second language, so I've some doubt. But you have the method, try.
Rushwr
  • Rushwr
gud one @PERCE-NEIGE
anonymous
  • anonymous
It is a horrible question. B is the most likely answer, but even that could be done via observations.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.