A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
Astrophysics
 one year ago
Hey, how can I treat combinations/ permutations with integral representations, for example the integrals represented here
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=8C3
I'm assuming it has to do with power/ infinite series? I'm not exactly sure, how would you get this?
Astrophysics
 one year ago
Hey, how can I treat combinations/ permutations with integral representations, for example the integrals represented here http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=8C3 I'm assuming it has to do with power/ infinite series? I'm not exactly sure, how would you get this?

This Question is Closed

Astrophysics
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0@ganeshie8 @Empty

Astrophysics
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0dw:1437076681063:dw

Empty
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1The thing I think I am able to kinda think, "Ok that is plausible but I don't quite see it yet" is the first one. Since the binomial coefficients come from expanding a binomial, that \((1+e^{it})^8\) seems to be doing something interesting there and then having the special term \(e^{3it}\) divided out some how and that causes it to remain or something. Hmmm cool. As for the bottom one, I wonder if it's similar or not. I guess we should expand it and check it out and see what we can find.

Astrophysics
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Oh so lets use binomial theorem \[(a+b)^n = \sum_{k=0}^{n} \left(\begin{matrix}n \\ k\end{matrix}\right)a^{nk}b^k\] ye?

Astrophysics
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0\[\left(\begin{matrix}n \\ k\end{matrix}\right) = \frac{ n! }{ k!(nk)! }\] (Using this to remind myself)

Astrophysics
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0\[(1+e^{i t})^8 = \sum_{k=0}^{8} \left(\begin{matrix}8 \\ k\end{matrix}\right)1^{8k}e^{i t k}\]

Astrophysics
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Any idea what t represents here?

SolomonZelman
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I am comfortable with nCr and nPr formulas that use factorial....

Empty
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Yeah it represents the variable of integration (which ok is probably not the answer you wanted) but since I know you're still getting used to complex numbers this integral will be a little strange for you. I think it might be a good idea to calculate these integrals and guess what will happen before hand and see what actually happens. If it doesn't make sense (Which it surely won't) then think about it a bit and see if you can figure out a reason for why the hell that would be. \[\int_0^{2 \pi} e^{ i t} dt\] \[\int_{ \pi}^{ \pi} e^{ i t} dt\] \[\int_0^{\pi} e^{ i t} dt\] It should be pretty quick to just evaluate these integrals, but when you throw complex numbers into things if you're not used to them it can make you doubt certain rules you know to be true so tell me if you have any problems and then we can talk about why these solutions to this combinatoric thing works out. :P

Astrophysics
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Alright thanks, I'll try them out :P

Empty
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1I'll give you a vague hint, it's related to vectors in equilibrium. :O

Empty
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1I'd say don't spend longer than 5 minutes on this, this is just a quick little intro so that when you come back from trying to figure this out you'll want to hear the explanation lol.

Astrophysics
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I got the first integral to be \[2\pi e^{2\pi t}\] but this is not making sense to me, I think I have to consider the complex plane

Astrophysics
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Mhm vectors in equilibrium

Empty
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Ahhh almost but not quite right, the integral will not have a \(2 \pi\) out front.

Astrophysics
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Rookie mistake, let me just write it out here \[\int\limits_{0}^{2 \pi} e^{i t} dt = \frac{ e^{ i t} }{ i } _{0}^{2 \pi} = i e^{i t} _{0}^{2\ \pi} = ie^{i 2\pi}+i \]

Astrophysics
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0\[\frac{ 1 }{ i } =  i\]

Empty
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Perfect! Now there are some simplifications to make, and to help, use: \[e^{i \theta} = \cos \theta + i \sin \theta\]

Astrophysics
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0right right eulers formula

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0it's just using a contour integral to pick out a certain point using the residue theorem or the Cauchy integral formula

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0$$\frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!}=\frac1{2\pi i}\oint\frac{f(z)}{z^{n+1}}\,dz$$ for holomorphic \(z\) using a simple loop contour of winding number \(1\)  this follows from the fact that we can write \(f\) as a Taylor series: $$f(z)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!}z^n\\$$ and the fact that the integral of meromorphic \(1/z\) in a loop around 0 is \(2\pi i\)  the total change in argument  so here we take $$f(z)=(1+z)^8=\sum_{k=0}^8\binom8k z^k=\sum_{k=0}^\infty\frac{f^{(k)}(0)}{k!}z^k$$

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0it follows $$\frac1{2\pi i}\oint\frac{(1+z)^8}{z^4}\, dz=\frac{f^{(3)}(0)}{3!}$$by looking at the power expansion, \(f^{(3)}(0)/3!\) corresponds to the coefficient of \(z^3\) in the series expansion, so $$\frac1{2\pi i}\oint\frac{(1+z)^8}{z^4}\, dz=\binom83$$

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0the other integral just follows from the fact that we have $$\oint_{\gamma} f(z)\, dz=\int_a^b f(z(t)) z'(t)\, dt$$where \(\gamma\) is a curve parameterized by \(z:[a,b]\to\mathbb{C}\)

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0so the simplest closed loop winding once about \(0\) that we know is simply the circle with radius \(1\), parameterized by \(z(t)=e^{it}\) on \([\pi,\pi]\), so \(z'(t)=ie^{it}\) and we have $$\frac1{2\pi i}\oint\frac{(1+z)^8}{z^4}\,dz=\frac1{2\pi i}\int_{\pi}^\pi\frac{(1+e^{it})^8}{e^{4it}}\cdot ie^{it}\, dt=\frac1{2\pi}\int_{\pi}^\pi\frac{(1+e^{it})^8}{e^{3it}}\, dt$$so $$\binom83=\frac1{2\pi}\int_{\pi}^\pi\frac{(1+e^{it})^8}{e^{3it}}\, dt$$

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0this sort of stuff is a very simple basic trick in complex analysis and has to do with the fact that a holomorphic function \(f(x+iy)=u(x,y)+iv(x,y)\) can be identified with a vector field \(\tilde f(x,y)=(u(x,y),v(x,y),0)\) on \(\mathbb{R}^3\), where the CauchyRiemann equations on \(f\) guarantee \(\nabla\times\tilde f=0\) i.e. \(\tilde f\) is conservative, and thus line integrals on closed curves in \(\tilde f\) vanishthat is, however, if \(\tilde f\) does not has a singularity. take for example the case of \(\tilde f=(y/(x^2+y^2),x/(x^2+y^2),0)\), where the closed line integrals do not vanish

Astrophysics
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Could you actually please explain what exactly a contour integral is, I know it has to do with integrating in the complex plane, but I don't really follow it.

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0it's the same thing as a line integral along a curve, only the scalar field and path/contour are complex

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0recall from multivariable calculus for a function \(f:\mathbb{R^2}\to\mathbb{R}\)$$\int_C f\, ds=\int_a^b f(r(t)))\cdot \r'(t)\\,dt$$where \(r:[a,b]\to\mathbb{R^2}\) parameterized a path in the plane

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0in complex analysis we similarly define for \(f:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{C}\) $$\int_\gamma f\, dz=\int_a^b f(z(t))\cdot z'(t)\, dt$$ where \(z:[a,b]\to\mathbb{C}\) parameterizes a path in the complex plane

Astrophysics
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Ah, interesting, thank you!

Astrophysics
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0@Empty So now simplifying the result of \[ie^{i 2 \pi}+i\] using eulers equation \[e^{i 2 \pi} = \cos(2 \pi) +i \sin(2 \pi) = 1+ 0\] \[i(1)+i \implies i+i = 0\] so that will be our result, awesome.

Astrophysics
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0For the second integral \[\large \int\limits_{ \pi}^{\pi} e^{i t} dt =  i e^{i t} _{\pi}^\pi = ie^{i \pi}+ i e ^{ i \pi}\] Using Euler's equation \[e^{i \pi} = \cos(\pi)+i \sin(\pi) = 1\] \[e^{i (\pi)} = \cos(\pi) + isin ( \pi) = 1\] noting that \[\cos(x) = \cos(x) ~~\text{even function}\] hence we get \[i(1)+i(1) = ii = 0 \]

Astrophysics
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Ok so the last one is different...\[ \large \int\limits_{0}^{\pi} e^{i t} dt =  i e^{ i t} _{0}^\pi =  i e ^{i \pi} + i = i(1)+i = 2i \]

Empty
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Good! So this last one is weird. Now let's look at the circle, since we have really been integrating around a circle, draw out the angles. So for the first one we have: dw:1437103238999:dw Imagine taking a unit vector and rotating it through this angle, and at every point adding them all together. Since every vector has another vector 180 degrees away from it, they will all cancel each other out like vectors in equilibrium.

Astrophysics
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0dw:1437104350913:dw

Empty
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1So the blue line is correct, that represents going from 0 to \(\pi\) for the third problem is good, but the pink line needs some work! Remember we start at \(\pi\) and go to \(\pi\) which is weird, since a negative angle means we started from rotating backwards. :P

Astrophysics
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Yeah haha, it is pi to pi, fixed! dw:1437110426405:dw

Empty
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Ok so the first two integrals gave the same value, that's because they were both the same integral. They just started at different spots on the circle and went all the way around while the last integral only went halfway around the circle!

Astrophysics
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Yup, I realized that haha, that was kind of neat, so this is just showing how to do complex integrals?
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.