anonymous
  • anonymous
***medal***
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Solve −4√x+3+18=6.
triciaal
  • triciaal
|dw:1437517443238:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
−4√x+3=−12

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

triciaal
  • triciaal
to continue with this problem divide each side by -4 to isolate the radicand
anonymous
  • anonymous
√x+3=3?
triciaal
  • triciaal
I was asking if i had the original correct
triciaal
  • triciaal
square each side
anonymous
  • anonymous
x+3=9
triciaal
  • triciaal
now check your x in the original
anonymous
  • anonymous
x=6 ?
triciaal
  • triciaal
|dw:1437518084930:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
yes, i know but the answer its x=6
anonymous
  • anonymous
right
triciaal
  • triciaal
review isolate the term with the variable maintain the balance for the equation -- whatever you do to one side also do to the other check the solution
triciaal
  • triciaal
yes x = 6
anonymous
  • anonymous
−4√6+3+18=6 −4√9+18=6 −4(3)+18=6 −12+18=6 6=6

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.