When devising a model, scientists can only use the information available during their lifetime. This means that the current model of the atom may be changed when new experiments are performed in the future. Does this mean that the currently accepted model of the atom is useless? Explain your answer.
Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
No, not useless, because the current models, even if wrong, still help explain may "unseen" things going on inside an atom, such as the "shells" and how many electrons in each shell. This helps explain the creation of "ionic" bonds, and chemical reactions, where negative charges inside an atom, will attract positive charges in another, due to missing an electron, or having an additional electron. While the "shells" may not exist, the model helps "show" the way chemical reactions work, and perhaps also how to construct better molecules, able to perform better than previous molecules or compounds.