At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
Solving the problem is easy, but I just am worried that there could be multiple cases, one in which the triangle could be acute and one in which the triangle could be obtuse. I don't think this problem is possible were the triangle to be a right triangle.
the angle at C is always 1/2 of the intercepted arc given OA and OB are perpendicular means the central angle is 90 degrees
Yep, that would be the case for an acute. I was then worried if it were possible, based on how the problem had to be constructed, that you could have C be inside the angle .
oh, yes that is possible
-.- i lost my graph with cancel xDDDDDDD
Oops, haha. I hate that x_X
And yeah, I thought it might be possible but I wasn't sure. If it's not possible then I don't want to claim multiple cases.
I know the circumcenter is outside the triangle if the triangle is obtuse. But since the circumcenter is the intersection of the perpendicular bisectors, I couldn't conclude whether or not I could still have the perpendicular bisectors intersect while OA still remainded perpendicular to OB.
the other case has
the thing is its not unique triangle but a unique angle :D xD
Ah. So there only is one case then?
it need not to be a bisector though :O
So what are you saying then? xD
your picture with C forming an obtuse angles meets the given conditions. O is the circumcenter OA is 90 deg to OB so it is valid... < C would be 135 in that case
u already set two cases xD
but 90+ obtuse noway
No, I agree, phi. But would O still be the intersection of the perpendicular bisectors under the given conditions? |dw:1437856512007:dw| I'm not sure if this picture is possible. I was trying to draw it out on my own and couldnt show that those perpendicular bisectors would still hit the circumcenter O. Sorry if my question isn't clear, lol.
yes, the perpendicular bisectors of the sides will meet at the circumcenter (but outside of the triangle)
Okay, so I do need two cases. Yeah, I couldnt prove it to myself that I need the answers of both 45 and 135 degrees, wanted to confirm :)
|dw:1437856799729:dw| Two triangles one acute and one obtuse, but both with the ability to fit the given conditions. That's what I was unsure of. But either way, I'll make sure to mention both cases :3
for what it is worth, here is a figure I made using Geogebra (free and useful tool) where the radiuses are perpendicular, and thus the third angle is 135 degrees It shows the perpendicular bisectors of the 3 legs as blue lines that intersect at the circumcenter.
Ah. Cool. I like that :) Yeah, our class has us using Geometer's Sketchpad, but that's not free :( I'll check out Geogebra ^_^
each side of the triangle is a chord of the circumcircle, and the perpendicular bisectors of a chord always goes through the circle's center. in other words, it *has to work*
That's interesting. Yeah, when you say that it definitely clears things up. Thanks again :)