anonymous
  • anonymous
Determine if the two figures are congruent and explain your answer.
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
1 Attachment
anonymous
  • anonymous
I know they ARE congruent I just need help explaining why.
anonymous
  • anonymous
@ganeshie8 @Elsa213 @poopsiedoodle @mathmath333 @OregonDuck @Keigh2015 @Jaynator495 @work12345 @wampominater @ROSEQUEEN2014 @uybuyvf @undeadknight26

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
@phi
anonymous
  • anonymous
@phi Please help
phi
  • phi
if you divide each figure into two triangles and show each triangle is congruent by side-side-side, to the corresponding triangle in the other figure, that would prove the figures are congruent.
anonymous
  • anonymous
That is what I say in my own words or do I have to do it too??
phi
  • phi
that is how to show the figures are congruent. but then you have to do the work. the length of each side can be found using the distance formula. do you know how to do that ?
anonymous
  • anonymous
d= sqrt(x_2-x_1/y_2-y_1)?
anonymous
  • anonymous
I totally forgot but I know it is something like that
phi
  • phi
the idea is based on the pythagorean theorem a^2 + b^2 = c^2 where a and b are the legs and c is the hypotenuse
phi
  • phi
the formula tells you how to find the length of each side using the coordinates but in your graph, we can just count.
phi
  • phi
For example the leg from point A to point D |dw:1438103882199:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
ye but how do we do it on mines?
phi
  • phi
it looks like if we slide the figure to try to overlay the other figure, side AD matches up with the side GH so find the length of GH. if you get sqrt(17) then they are the same length
phi
  • phi
make a triangle using side GH it has height 1 and width 4
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1438104168143:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
Now what?
phi
  • phi
yes. now pick another side in the first figure. side CD and compare it to side EH in the other figure.
anonymous
  • anonymous
In the problem or example?
phi
  • phi
The examples are from your problem. In other words, we have already shown AD and GH have the same size. now we do CD and EH
anonymous
  • anonymous
CD= Length 1; Width 4 EH= Length -4; Width 1 Am I right?
phi
  • phi
yes, but we don't care if it's -4. when we find the length -4*-4 = 16 (always positive) so if they have the same numbers 1 and 4 then the lengths will end up being the same
anonymous
  • anonymous
CD 1*1 + 4*4 = 16+1 = 17 = sqrt17 EH 1*1 +-4*-4 = 16 +1 = 17 = sqrt17 So segment CD and EH are congruent.
phi
  • phi
yes
anonymous
  • anonymous
So now what do I do?
phi
  • phi
I would do BC and FE (I mentally shifted the figures so they lay on top of each other to decide which legs should match up)
anonymous
  • anonymous
BC: Height 2; Width -1 FE: Height 1; Width 2 Right?
phi
  • phi
yes
anonymous
  • anonymous
BC 2*2 + -1*-1 = 2+1 = 3 = sqrt3 FE 1*1 + 2*2 = 1 + 2 = 3 = sqrt3 Segment BC IS congruent to Segment FE Did I do it right?
phi
  • phi
they are congruent, but you check 2*2 is 4 (not 2)
anonymous
  • anonymous
oh yeah oops sqrt5 sqrt5
anonymous
  • anonymous
So now what do I do?
phi
  • phi
what two sides are left to check?
anonymous
  • anonymous
FG and AB
phi
  • phi
yes
anonymous
  • anonymous
AB: Height 1; Width -2 FG: Height 2; Width 1 Right?
phi
  • phi
yes
anonymous
  • anonymous
AB 1*1 + -2*-2 = 1+4 = 5 = sqrt5 FG 2*2 + 1*1 = 4+1 = 5 = sqrt5 Segment AB IS congruent to Segment FE Right?
phi
  • phi
yes. I think there is a theorem that says if all 4 sides are congruent , then the two figures are congruent. But we don't have to use it. if we show that BD = HF (the diagonals) then that shows the triangles match by SSS, and I know that definitely is true.
anonymous
  • anonymous
So I just say that they are congruent because BD=HF by SSS or do I write what we did?
phi
  • phi
BD=HF by doing the same thing: both are 3 width and 3 height so each is sqrt(18) long and therefore congruent.
phi
  • phi
so we know that triangle BCD can be laid directly on top of triangle FEH because they are congruent by SSS we also know triangle BAD can be laid on top of triangle FGH because they are congruent. when we do that , we see that the shape ABCD lies directly on top of GFEH proving they are congruent.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Oh okay thank you @phi I appreciate you making me able to understand this.
phi
  • phi
yw

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.