A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
anonymous
 one year ago
Domain Values question. (Picture of question in thread)
anonymous
 one year ago
Domain Values question. (Picture of question in thread)

This Question is Closed

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1First of all, we should write down what the composition looks like, it's a bit ugly, but have you done that step?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0No, I didn't even start this question because that's how unsure I am.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Alright, that's fine. Just a quick review then. With function compositions remember that one function "eats" the other one. What on earth am I talking about? An example would help... Think about two easier functions just for practice. \[f(x) = \sqrt{x}\] and \[g(x) = 4x\] Then, if we are to find \[f \circ g\], we will plug in all of g(x) into the f function. We get this \[f\circ g = \sqrt{g(x)} = \sqrt{4x}\] Does that make sense on how the composition works?

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Since sometimes I personally like to know what's coming next, for our situation we will get this \[\sqrt{8g(x)} = \sqrt{8 \cdot \frac{1}{x4}} = \sqrt{\frac{8}{x4}}\]

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Basically, replace the "x" in the original f function with the "g(x)" function. That's all there is to finding the composition.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Let me know when you are ready to look at the domain part. :)

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I'm a little overwhelmed by this..

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1I imagine. It's quite a lot to get hit with. Maybe we should start simpler. Let's think about the functions from the actual problem.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1\[f(x) = \sqrt{8x}\] and \[g(x) = \frac{1}{x4}\] We're ok with that so far right?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Yes, this is a nice start.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1OK, now let's get the composition thing straight, maybe my first attempt was too complex. If I told you to find f(2) that would be easy right?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I apologize, but where would I even began to do that?

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1OK! Great question. No need to apologize. Seems like you are a little confused on function notation. That's fine, I was before too. :) f(2) is a shorthand way of saying "Plug x = 2 into the function for f."

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1So, what we would see is \[f(2) = \sqrt{8\cdot 2} = \sqrt{16}.\] It's really not that bad once you know what the "secret code" is. Any questions on that?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Wow that made things a lot simplier. Okay we're getting somewhere.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Haha! I always had those moments in math class, "Why didn't you just say so???" :)

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Glad to help! No need to be in the dark about the secret of functions. They are kind of dumb, but some mathematician way back in the 1700s or something created a shorthand code for himself, and everybody just started copying him.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1So, anyways. It's easy to plug in a single number into a function. We could do f(2) f(1) f(100) g(45) g(1) g(3.4) until the cows came home. This is easy. We just plug x = some number into the formula.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Now, the big word "composition" sounds like really sophisticated rocket science. But it's actually very simple and is based on plugging in numbers.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1A "composition" just happens when we plug an "equation" into the function instead of a single "number".

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1It's weird, but it's the same idea as plugging a number into the function.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1So, if I said f(2x4), I have done a composition. I plugged in an equation instead of a number. I would do the same thing as if it were a number: \[f(2x4) = \sqrt{8\cdot(2x4)} = \sqrt{16x  32}\] That's a lot at once, but do you kind of see how that works?

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1By the way, once you have these basic concepts down, you'll never have to do this depth of thinking again. The question itself is very easy, but it assumes that you know about composition. :)

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Ok, I'm starting to understand better now

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1"basic" as in "the foundation of the question" , not "basic" as in "duh easy". :)

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Alright, good! We are almost ready to finish off the problem itself. There's just one more "shorthand" AGAIN to mention.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Since functions (basically the same thing as equations) sometimes have names (like f or g) we could also write things like f(g(x)) What this means is plug whatever the g(x) equation is into the f function.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1So, if g(x) were something like g(x) = 3x. Then, \[f(g(x)) = f(3x) = \sqrt{8 \cdot (3x)}\]

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Obviously, I'm using a different g(x) than the problem as an example, but does that part make sense so far? That's basically what we did a minute ago.

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Yes it is definitely starting to make sense.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1OK, cool. You are doing great!

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Alright, so mathematicians like some messes (just look at some equations), but don't like others (they're weird like that). They decided that they don't like the way that this f(g(x)) looks. It has too many parentheses and looks messy.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1I mean, we just used it and it makes sense... but nooooooo.... they created a new "shorthand" to deal with this: \[f \circ g = f(g(x))\]

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1So, what they did is to say "Alright, when we write f circle thing g" we REALLY mean "plug the g(x) equation into the f function".... whatever, it's a code, it's fine, it's dumb... but yeah, sure, whatever you say. :P

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1That's what the "f circle thing g" means in the question. Just thought I would point that out. OK so far?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So fog is just another name for f(g(x))?

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Yes. Why do they have to confuse the issue? I don't know... And by the same logic: gof is just another name for g(f(x)) [if for some reason you wanted to plug f into g]

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I'm glad you're helping me with this, I would of never knew otherwise.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Yep, it only took me getting a math major at university for me to start figuring this stuff out... how would we have known?

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1In any case, now that we know what f(number) means "just plug x = number" and we know that composition is just plugging in an equation, we can now start answering the crazy (but relatively easy) question given to us.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1We are told to think about fog, we now know that this means f(g(x)). So, just plug in the equation for g into the one for f. \[f\circ g = f(g(x)) = f(\frac{1}{x4}) = \sqrt{8 \cdot \frac{1}{x4}} = \sqrt{\frac{8}{x4}}\]

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1He's an ugly looking fella isn't he? But, that can't be helped... :)

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0This looks a lot better seeing it now then when we first started.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Yep, funny how the exact equation can look like total gibberish one second, then actually look simpler once you know the meanings behind all the symbols.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1So, now for the next idea: Domain.... oooooooohhh aaaaahhh. Nope. Not that impressive. Domains are just lists of numbers that are allowed in the equation. There are only a few things that CANNOT ever HAPPEN: 1. We do not allow fractions to divide by 0. 2. We do not allow square roots to have negative insides. Like \[\sqrt{4}\] is not allowed. 3. There are other "bad things." If you study logarithms (sort of like exponents), we don't allow them to equal 0 or be negative. Don't worry about this for now, we don't have logarithms in this question.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1The question wants us to find the number that is definitely in the domain (it is an OK number and doesn't break any rules...)

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Start with 4. Does plugging in x = 4 into our crazy equation cause any problems?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0It doesn't seem like it.

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Of course I may be wrong.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Sure, and that's totally fine, let's take a close look at the "instant reply" :)

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1\[\sqrt{\frac{8}{x4}} \rightarrow \sqrt{\frac{8}{44}} \rightarrow \sqrt{\frac{8}{0}}\] duhn duhn... DUUUUUHHNNN!

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1OH NO! It's the revenge of dividing a fraction by 0!

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1So, our poor 4 is not in the domain. He creates an equation that doesn't make sense to us. The answer is not 4. Any questions on that one?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Wow, I see how this works now.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Awesome! We will continue this little plugin game until we find something that works. How about x = 0 as our next candidate?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.00's aren't allowed, if I'm not mistaken.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.10's aren't allowed to be divided by. 0's in general are OK. So, this is OK: 0 + 4. Sure I know what that means. And this is OK: 8 * 0. I know what that means. Even this is OK: 0/8. That's just 0. But dividing by 0 is not OK: 8/0. DANGER DANGER! So, let's just plug 0 in and see what happens. We never know.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1\[\sqrt{\frac{8}{04}} = \sqrt{\frac{8}{4}}\] so far so good.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1\[\sqrt{2}\] aww... dang it...

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1negative insides in square roots are not allowed. x = 0 fails the test... at least he didn't divide by 0, but he's still out.

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I think 6 is our number for this one.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Alright, let's see, I really hope so. x = 6... come on down, you are our next contestant!

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1\[\sqrt{\frac{8}{64}} = \sqrt{\frac{8}{2}} = \sqrt{4} = 2\] VICTORY!

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Finally, something that makes sense! You can see that x = 9 will be bad news just like x = 0. it will create a square root of a negative number. We have our answer x = 6 is in the domain and AOKAY!

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0You make math pretty fun to learn, and I don't even know how that's possible.

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1LOL! Maybe when you've been tortured enough with math you just finally crack and start making sense. I'm glad you found it enjoyable! If only more teachers would see that math has real meaning, it's not just random rules (well... some rules are random). It doesn't need to be overly complicated. :)

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Yeah, if only they knew. Lol.

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Okay so I have another question similar to this one

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Alright, I'll take a quick look, I may have to check out soon, it's almost midnight here and as you can probably tell I'm clearly starting to lose it. But's let's take a look. :)

jtvatsim
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1This thread is getting cluttered and slowing down, so if you could post a new question that'd be great. :)
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.