A community for students.

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

iiAriana

  • one year ago

¥

  • This Question is Closed
  1. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    The case relates to freedom of speech. Speech in this case doesn't only mean speaking, but rather what you wear, and even the type of music you like. The case is about the children wanting to freely express themselves, and the school board is saying that they cannot express themselves if they are disrupting the children's environment and messing with the schools lunch plans. In the Tinker v. Des Moines case, the children wanted to wear their symbolic wristbands to support an idea they cared strongly about. The school board ordered them to take the wristbands off because they were disrupting the children's learning. The case went to the supreme court and the children won because the school was taking away their first amendment right of freedom of speech.

  2. iiAriana
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Thanks

  3. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    no problem

  4. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.