Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
The case relates to freedom of speech. Speech in this case doesn't only mean speaking, but rather what you wear, and even the type of music you like.
The case is about the children wanting to freely express themselves, and the school board is saying that they cannot express themselves if they are disrupting the children's environment and messing with the schools lunch plans.
In the Tinker v. Des Moines case, the children wanted to wear their symbolic wristbands to support an idea they cared strongly about. The school board ordered them to take the wristbands off because they were disrupting the children's learning. The case went to the supreme court and the children won because the school was taking away their first amendment right of freedom of speech.