At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
do you know how to do a "dot product" ?
multiply corresponding elements and then add
if you get 0, the vectors are perpendicular (orthogonal, and form a 90 angle)
you can also factor 4 from v to write it as 4<-7,4>
the 4 "out front" does not change the direction, so you need only work with <-7,4>
@phi I did not get zero. I thought that the answer was neither, is that correct?
Since you tested out the dot product and found that it does not equal 0, you know they are not perpendicular.
Now test if these two are parallel by taking the dot product of their magnitudes and comparing the dot product of their magnitudes to the dot product of the two vectors you found earlier.
If you end up with the same result, then you know the vectors are parallel :)
Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.
yes, they are not perpendicular.
the other trick is to notice what we get if we factor -4 from v
v = <-28, 16>
v = -4<7,-4>
we can't factor anything else out, so it is in simplest from
but notice u = <7,-4>
u and v point in the same direction (but v is "longer")
in other words, they are parallel.