anonymous
  • anonymous
Which of the following best explains the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore? It decided that Florida’s first recount should resume in all disputed counties until completed and Bush was the winner. It decided that the Florida Supreme Court decision to hold a new recount was unconstitutional and Bush was the winner. It decided that the Florida Supreme Court decision to hold a new recount was appropriate according to the Constitution. It decided that Florida’s first recount was against the Constitution and states cannot order recounts in any future election.
History
chestercat
  • chestercat
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

Nurali
  • Nurali
i think It decided that the Florida Supreme Court decision to hold a new recount was unconstitutional and Bush was the winner.
anonymous
  • anonymous
thank you
Nurali
  • Nurali
My Pleasure.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
medal ? sorry im new to this
Nurali
  • Nurali
Welcome to Openstudy.
anonymous
  • anonymous
thanks

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.