anonymous
  • anonymous
given the diagram below micheal writes triangle abc is congruent to triangle cda. which of the following reasons allows him to write this statement.
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
@nincompoop @ben815 @mathstudent55
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1438644333229:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
@mathmate

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
@Pencera
mathmate
  • mathmate
There is not enough information to make the claim using the given diagram alone. |dw:1438644500407:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
on the other side it says c and d
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1438644569895:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
@mathmate
mathmate
  • mathmate
We cannot make the claim without knowing any of the dimensions or properties of the sides or angles.
anonymous
  • anonymous
a angle addiction postulate b sss property c corresponding parts of congruent polygons theorem d symmetric property
anonymous
  • anonymous
@mathmate
mathmate
  • mathmate
I am not looking for choice of answers. There is simply (almost) no information to make any claim of congruence.
anonymous
  • anonymous
@nincompoop @mathstudent55
anonymous
  • anonymous
@dan815 @Hero
mathmate
  • mathmate
I suggest you check the diagram for missing information. This is what you currently provide: |dw:1438645020244:dw|

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.