Determine whether the origin is included in the shaded region and whether the shaded region is above or below the line for the graph of the following inequality: y > three fifthsx − 2 The origin is not included in the shaded region and the shaded area is above the line. The origin is not included in the shaded region and the shaded area is below the line. The origin is included in the shaded region and the shaded area is above the line. The origin is included in the shaded region and the shaded area is below the line.

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions.

A community for students.

Determine whether the origin is included in the shaded region and whether the shaded region is above or below the line for the graph of the following inequality: y > three fifthsx − 2 The origin is not included in the shaded region and the shaded area is above the line. The origin is not included in the shaded region and the shaded area is below the line. The origin is included in the shaded region and the shaded area is above the line. The origin is included in the shaded region and the shaded area is below the line.

Mathematics
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

@queen-of-tokyo

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

Hey there :) Let's answer the second part of the question first, because it's really simple.
When you have something like this: \(\large\rm y\lt \color{orangered}{2x+3}\) Think of it like this: \(\large\rm y\lt \color{orangered}{\text{the line}}\) The orange part represents the line. So in this example, we want all of the `y values` which are `less than` `the line`. So in this example we would shade `below` the line.
How bout in your problem? y is GREATER THAN some line. So where we gonna shade?
above the line correct? @zepdrix
k good :) that already narrows down our choices!
\[\large\rm y\gt\frac{3}{5}x-2\]Recall that the origin is the point (0,0). So let's just plug it in... and find out if the inequality holds true!
\[\large\rm 0\gt\frac{3}{5}\cdot0-2\]After you simplify this a bit, does the inequality hold true?
no
its the same right?
So after simplifying, we have, 0 > -2
Hmm that appears to hold true, ya? 0 is larger than -2
oh yes my bad i was looking at the wrong thing
Ok good! So we figured out that the point (0,0) DOES in fact satisfy our inequality. So it is included in the shaded area.
thanks could you help mw with one more
sure, i can try :)
Given the system of equations presented here: 3x + 5y = 29 x + 4y = 16 Which of the following actions creates an equivalent system such that, when combined with the other equation, one of the variables is eliminated? Multiply the second equation by −1 to get −x − 4y = −16 Multiply the second equation by −3 to get −3x − 12y = −48 Multiply the first equation by −1 to get −3x − 5y = −29 Multiply the first equation by −3 to get −9x − 15y = −87
You're trying to match up the coefficients on either the x's or the y's, but not both. If we wanted to match up the x's, maybe we would need some kind of 3. If we wanted to match up the y's, it would be a little more difficult. We would multiply the first equation by 4, and the second equation by -5. They would then both have coefficients of 20, one of them being negative. So they would combine nicely. They didn't do that here though. They went the easier route. They're matching up the x's somehow.
We want them to match. Notice the first equation already has a 3, so it doesn't need anything more.
So what do you wanna do to the second equation to match them up?
add a 1 to the x?
The first equation has 3x. The second equation has x. If we add 1 to x, hmm I'm not really sure what that will do for us :d We want the same number of x in both equations.
We don't want to add. We want to multiply that second equation by some number that will turn it from x to some kind of 3x.
you would multiply it by 3 then
Good good good, we would multiply the second equation 3! That would give us 3x. But in order for them to combine, and disappear, we want one of them to be negative. So let's instead multiply the second equation by negative 3.
boom bam! yay team!
so the answer is D yes? @zepdrix
Option D talks about changes to equation 1. We were making changes to equation 2.
oh ok i wasn't reading carefully but thank you for your help :) @zepdrix

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question