A community for students.

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

Melissa_Something

  • one year ago

Does the weight of a vehicle get heavier with speed? & Why?

  • This Question is Open
  1. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yes mass becomes greater as the the velocity increases

  2. Melissa_Something
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    How and why?

  3. Melissa_Something
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    && I'm talking about weight not mass!

  4. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Oh weight is defined by the gravitational pool

  5. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    pull*

  6. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    So if you go faster then centripetal acceleration will increase

  7. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    oh by the way weight doesn't change by velocity

  8. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    in special relativity mass is the one that changes depending on the velocity of that objectt

  9. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    weigh comes as a result of gravitational pull which doesn't vary if the object is assumed to be equidistant from the initial point ok?

  10. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Ignore the centripetal acceleration crap I snapped

  11. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    equidistant to the radius of the object

  12. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Hey yo irish boy what's your take on this ?

  13. IrishBoy123
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    hi @Robert136 i am a bit warey about getting stuck in as i think it is more complicated that first appears, certainly to me \(E = E_0 \gamma \) looks easy, ie if the OP's car is travelling at v m/s, plug v into \(\large \frac{m_oc^2}{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}\) and, for someone in a stationary reference frame, you're done. mass increases, very slightly of course. but to an observer standing on the sun, her car is travelling at 80,000mph (ignoring the acceleration/ non inertial) ; and in the OP's reference frame both the earth and the sun should increase in mass as they are moving relative to the car. and she shouldn't notice any time dilation/length contraction/mass increase in her reference frame , it's the things moving relative to her that will appear "weird". that's a headful of headache for me lol!!!

  14. IrishBoy123
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @Michele_Laino has written a tutorial on spesh rel. we have an expert in the forum, should that be needed :p

  15. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    As others above have said, it's actually a very subtle, technical issue. For the effect you're mentioning, you actually need to use Einstein's general relativity formalism to understand gravitational effects and how they're related to mass and gravitational acceleration. See the "simple examples of mass in general relativity" section on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_in_general_relativity#Questions.2C_answers.2C_and_simple_examples_of_mass_in_general_relativity There, they address specifically how a hot object would indeed have greater gravitational attraction than a cold object, because of the increased thermal energy (which is ultimately motion of the molecules). In the same vain, a moving object would experience an altered gravitational pull, although there doesn't appear to be a consistent explanation or calculation involved. It gets hard to define the definite question you could ask. One quote from the wikipedia page:"The only difference between the "hot" and "cold" systems in our last question is due to the motion of the particles in the gas inside the pressure vessel. Doesn't this imply that a moving particle has "more gravity" than a stationary particle? This remark is probably true in essence, but it is difficult to quantify. Unfortunately, it is not clear how to measure the "gravitational field" of a single relativistically moving object. It is clear that it is possible to view gravity as a force when one has a stationary metric - but the metric associated with a moving mass is not stationary."

  16. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    This is just the rest of that Wikipedia section, might as well post it too: "While definitional and measurement issues constrain our ability to quantify the gravitational field of a moving mass, one can measure and quantify the effect of motion on tidal gravitational forces. When one does so, one finds that the tidal gravity of a moving mass is not spherically symmetrical - it is stronger in some directions than others. One can also say that, averaged over all directions, the tidal gravity increases when an object moves. Some authors have used the total velocity imparted by a "flyby" rather than tidal forces to gain an indirect measure of the increase in gravitational "effective mass" of relativistically moving objects (Olson & Guarino 1985) While there is unfortunately no single definitive way to interpret the space-time curvature caused by a moving mass as a Newtonian force, one can definitely say that the motion of the molecules in a hot object increases the mass of that object. Note that in General Relativity, gravity is caused not by mass, but by the stress–energy tensor. Thus, saying that a moving particle has "more gravity" does not imply that the particle has "more mass". It only implies that the moving particle has "more energy"."

  17. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Incidentally, I've never seen it written, but I searched it and it should actually be "in the same vein" instead of 'vain.'

  18. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I think, the mass will decrease as you go faster..and so that the weight.. Ta Da... now don't ask me how... :P

  19. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    W=m*g So no,since the mass of the object NEVER changes and the gravitation pull stays the same (~10) the weight does not change

  20. Melissa_Something
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @irishboy123 @shigalntern Do you think this is right? ^ Lol

  21. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.