At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
By general law, life and limb must be protected; yet often a limb must be amputated to save a life, but a life is never wisely given to save a limb. I felt that measures, otherwise unconstitutional, might become lawful by becoming indispensable to the preservation of the Constitution through the preservation of the nation. Right or wrong, I assumed this ground, and now avow it. I could not feel that to the best of my ability I had even tried to preserve the Constitution, if, to save slavery, or any minor matter, I should permit the wreck of government, country, and Constitution altogether.
WOW! ok here goes
http://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/hodges.htm I'm not done
http://openstudy.com/study#/updates/5247c756e4b02491552cecee another user answered this: ok what Lincoln was trying to say is by eliminating the bad would be saving the good. Then this is confusing, the limb and life are examples, you say um a shark is near you, so you have to save your life but you can't save your life if your just saving your limb. Doesn't make sense . His letter was about slavery, good against bad
It makes no sense, Lincoln asserts, to uphold the Constitution if doing so means that the nation that constitution serves will be lost. http://ashbrook.org/publications/oped-knippenberg-09-constitution-day/
Lincoln is saying that he cannot let the country be destroyed only to save the constitution. this is how he relates it back to amputating a limb to save a life
does that make sense?
umm... okhay i seee!!!