At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
That looks kinda crazy, I know, but it's because of the lack of accuracy and the fact I have no graph paper. That is a circle that has an equation of (x−4)2+(y+4)2=4 and a line that intersects (or touches) the circle at the point (4,-2) with a slope of 2. The line has a y intercept of -4. So the equation for the line is y=2x−4 and the point in common, aka the solution, to that system is (4,-2). The way you would do the algebra part is to show that the point (4,-2) works in both equations to make them both true. (x−4)2+(y+4)2=4 for the point (4,-2) is as follows: (4−4)2+(−2+4)2=4 (0)2+(2)2=4 4=4
wiat...let me refiigure that line
The equation for the line is y=14x−3 Now, let's show that the point (4,-2) makes this equation true just like it does for the circle. Subbing in -2 for y and 4 for x, we get: −2=14(4)−3 −2=1−3 −2=−2
the linear equation is y=14x-3
|dw:1439475598238:dw| here is the graph
dang...it didnt show...
ok here is the quadratic (x-4)^2+(y=4)^2=4
yes now the line is obviously your line and the circle is the quadratic
you plot it on the graph
sorry, i am not really good at showing my work. im only good at doing it
"@MeganChase went offline"
You guys were using a circle but the question asked for a quadratic (parabola). Is any shape acceptable?
ok. so scratch the stuff using this equation "(x-4)^2+(y=4)^2=4" but keep the line y = 2x - 4 as the linear equation. For a quadratic equation, keep it simple and just square the x to get y = 2x² - 4
graph y = 2x - 4 and y = 2x² - 4 here https://www.desmos.com/calculator
it is, but just so you know the solution to that isn't rational so you're going to have to deal with square roots/decimals
ok. either way the process is the same. since they're both y = something, you can use substitution and drop the y's y = 2x² - 4 and y = 2x - 4 are the equations so we can say \[2x^2 - 4 = 2x - 4\]
Do you know how to solve that for x?
right so now subtract 2x from both sides 2x² - 2x = 0 Factor out 2x 2x(x - 1) = 0 Set each factor equal to 0 and solve 2x = 0 → x = 0 x - 1 = 0 → x = 1
yes for part 2 it looks like all you have to do is graph the line and parabola and make sure you show the intersection points because that is the solution. We still have to find the y-values for part 1 though. Just plug in 0 and 1 into either equation to get them. For x = 0: y = 2(0) - 4 For x = 1: y = 2(1) - 4 And that will give the 2 intersection points/solutions
I don't know that it matters. They mean the same thing, just different notations. You can use y for both, or you can use function notation. If you use function notation and call the linear function f(x) then call the quadratic g(x). It doesn't matter as long as you're consistent throughout the problem
So your solutions to the system are (0, -4) and (1, -2). Which you can see from the graph https://www.desmos.com/calculator/wdb2i4kk5d