A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
sh3lsh
 one year ago
Determinant question
sh3lsh
 one year ago
Determinant question

This Question is Closed

sh3lsh
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2\[A =\left \begin{array}{ccc} v_{1} \\ v_{2} \\ v_{3}\\v_{4}\end{array} \right \det = 8\] What is the det of \[\left \begin{array}{ccc} 6v_{1} +2v_{4} \\ v_{2} \\ v_{3}\\v_{4} + 3v_{1}\end{array} \right\]

terenzreignz
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2Gotta love row operations ^^ Let's be general here: \[\det\left[ \begin{array}{ccc} v_{1} \\ v_{2} \\ v_{3}\\v_{4}\end{array} \right] =k\]

terenzreignz
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2Three elementary row operations: switch, multiply, and "add row multiple" All these have distinct effects on the determinant of the original matrix ^^

sh3lsh
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2Yeah! So I thought the answer would be that it would just be scaled by 3, because scalar addition or subtraction doesn't affect the determinant! However, the answer says it's 0, because the first row is twice the last. That didn't make much sense to me!

terenzreignz
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2When you switch one pair of rows, such as here: \[\det\left[ \begin{array}{ccc} v_{1} \\ \color{red}{v_{3}} \\ \color{blue}{v_{2}}\\v_{4}\end{array} \right] =k\] the determinant gets negated. And will be negated for every pair of rows that you switch :D

terenzreignz
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2The first row is indeed twice the last. Are you finding it hard to believe that that causes the determinant to be zero? ^^

sh3lsh
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2Oops, scaled by 6! (v1 in first row is scaled by 6) Yeah, how does that change anything if the 4th row is a multiple of the first? Does that mean that the 4th row is redundant and if I rref'ed it the row would be 0, so if I tried to take the diagonals it would be 0?

terenzreignz
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2Okay. Let's take a weird approach to this. First, what I said: Switching a pair of rows causes the determinant to be negated or multiplied by a factor of (1). Next, multiplying a row by a scalar in turn scales the determinant by that scalar. ie \[\det\left[ \begin{array}{ccc} v_{1} \\ \color{green}{n}v_{2} \\ v_{3}\\v_{4}\end{array} \right] =\color{green}{n}k\]

terenzreignz
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2So far, so good, yes? ^^

terenzreignz
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2So suppose we have a matrix where the first row is a multiple of the last row, and suppose its determinant was d. Like this \[\Large \det\left[ \begin{array}{ccc} mu_{3} \\ u_{1} \\ u_{2}\\u_{3}\end{array} \right]=h \]

terenzreignz
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2If we switch the first and fourth rows, as per the rule, the determinant gets multiplied by (1) We get \[\Large \det\left[ \begin{array}{ccc} \color{red}{u_{3}} \\ u_{1} \\ u_{2}\\ \color{red}{mu_{3}}\end{array} \right]=\color{red}{h}\]

terenzreignz
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2If we scale the first row by m, as per the other rule, the determinant gets scaled as well by a factor of m. \[\Large \det\left[ \begin{array}{ccc} \color{red}mu_{3} \\ u_{1} \\ u_{2}\\mu_{3}\end{array} \right]=h\color{red}{(m)}\]

terenzreignz
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2Now we scale the fourth row by 1/m. Again, by the rules, this would also scale the determinant by a factor of 1/m. \[\Large \det\left[ \begin{array}{ccc} mu_{3} \\ u_{1} \\ u_{2}\\ \color{red}{\left(\frac1m\right)}mu_{3}\end{array} \right]=h(m)\color{red}{\left(\frac1m\right)}\]

terenzreignz
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2Simplifying, we get \[\Large \det\left[ \begin{array}{ccc} mu_{3} \\ u_{1} \\ u_{2}\\u_{3}\end{array} \right]=h\] We ended up with our original matrix, but THIS time, we have shown that its determinant is also equal to h. That can only mean h = h Or h = 0 Done ^^

sh3lsh
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2You are awesome! Thanks!
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.