A community for students.

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

anonymous

  • one year ago

Which of the following must be true for adiabatic processes?

  • This Question is Closed
  1. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    A) \(C_v = C_p\) B) \(\Delta H = 0\) C) \(\Delta U = 0\) D) \(\Delta S = 0\) E) \(q=0\)

  2. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I put B which is wrong. I don't think any of these answer choices given are right though.

  3. taramgrant0543664
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    An adiabatic process is one in which no heat is gained or lost by the system.

  4. taramgrant0543664
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    There is one that is right there

  5. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I agree with you but I think the correct answer should be \(\Delta q = 0\)

  6. JoannaBlackwelder
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    In an adiabatic change, q = 0, so the First Law becomes ΔU = 0 + w.

  7. taramgrant0543664
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yes it is The first law of thermodynamics with Q=0 shows that all the change in internal energy is in the form of work done. This puts a constraint on the heat engine process leading to the adiabatic condition shown below. This condition can be used to derive the expression for the work done during an adiabatic process.

  8. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I thought Q was a constant, so the change in Q is 0. @JoannaBlackwelder why isn't it \(\Delta U = \Delta q + \Delta w \) and \(U=q+w\) ?

  9. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @taramgrant0543664 I guess I'm not familiar with this notation, since when I think of adiabatic I think the heat content is not zero but the change in the heat content is 0. Does what I'm asking make sense?

  10. taramgrant0543664
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I'm pretty sure ΔU=Δq+Δw is used for isobaric conditions

  11. JoannaBlackwelder
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Take a look here: http://www.chem1.com/acad/webtext/energetics/CE-2.html#S3A

  12. taramgrant0543664
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    The a diabetic system doesn't allow heat in or out so its not a change it would be just 0

  13. JoannaBlackwelder
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    When q is positive, heat is added, when q is negative heat is taken out, and when q is 0 there is no heat transfer.

  14. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Well I know what adiabatic means, that's not the problem, I don't think the notation is correct. For example when we substitute in things in the differential form: \[dU=dq+dw\] we can substitute in \[TdS=dq\] or \[pdV=dw\] to get \[dU=TdS+pdV\] But this is different, if you're writing \[dU=q+w\] that's a different thing altogether.

  15. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    So what I'm saying is \(\Delta q=0\) should be the correct answer not \(q=0\) because: \(q=0\) means there is no heat content. \(\Delta q=0\) means there is no change in heat content. Which is what adiabatic means to me, since none was transferred. Does this help clear up what I'm asking specifically @JoannaBlackwelder and @taramgrant0543664 ?

  16. taramgrant0543664
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I get where you're coming from it is a little confusing I never really looked at it like that

  17. JoannaBlackwelder
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    The notation q=0 doesn't mean no heat content. It means no change in heat content.

  18. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I guess I should just accept that this is what the notation means. In thinking about if the equation was actually \(U=q+w\) (not \(\Delta U\) ) then that would mean the internal energy U is the sum of its internal heat energy q and then what's w? While it might make sense to think of q as the internal heat energy, I guess w is more like potential energy? Or pressure energy? I guess it falls apart to think of it like this. Thanks for your help both of you @taramgrant0543664 and @JoannaBlackwelder I guess I'll try to sort this out a little more on my own unless you have more you'd like to add! :D

  19. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.